From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_DKIM_INVALID shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22E51F404 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756538AbeDKUBT (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:01:19 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f176.google.com ([209.85.216.176]:42416 "EHLO mail-qt0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933873AbeDKS4W (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:56:22 -0400 Received: by mail-qt0-f176.google.com with SMTP id j3so3149159qtn.9 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 11:56:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=kicJFQk1mJrD2u6rKGkyj3hYeaDbIVnA6iT57OXmeYc=; b=DXfI27qYhqoCSrZ8tZq6UqrbGRVAjSkZjnV0PHo5hJH2IJ5o6AUVXPW85FB71Wjf/f Lz1+cxN0SE3V4PM2eVz+zEq+8aXfbmP3tSSyXPzNoW/kTaQDVfkP80s4FudG9wZlWVRA gHjE7obUpTTkBgZWIdXitKI65M3qAGq2zLwisB7oebMZ5+bRZeYqfV7ibC96YQTAwcuc 6W+QtuyNOmE5KOWPEJF2vzbbj/h+eCM5yyiO0peL4Xzxdqq0w2fA3ONWIrV45V0rv0Nq 4VuIfZkJFJI+nrfpc1IRXLT0YHURWY7jy1J9Dw6v9awz5eVxNJ8Nd5tN8BUEg5ILBPAC UxIQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kicJFQk1mJrD2u6rKGkyj3hYeaDbIVnA6iT57OXmeYc=; b=qFxEjxJ0TH8ah+lUPJkPAMLfyTFivV6VrHip85+wuX6YGp4ghoAhE/cQQL6uZGwsXs 974MgG9xMgXVqL37Uieeovt6RqOdHnYD2JXVLJNsJ++VAAMvAipJojE/uJ45nWeHXzYu 88yxXTA2tMe4LM2eSgGjQQhRFHqIeGbcGIJfuGg58a+VCwKEQHU6HH0WyD48Tk3Z5XnS KTJvU84VXX+RR7VzTFAFzXOuYPATOOgU6kR4yNWzZdM4vvcssJWPdM+Hgdu65slsq9oM umnWvZjplmfQAoXeNzmskPC8Ca56HkptcEjuZ+WAppmmjtrA1akN9AfSiiZJI6puYbhp 7DkQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDj1U/AVKig1GNZQWGCDy+/Hx2Mxr1sZhDjrU3FaMXeQXUWlFXG amwfX9xWzG0RKYhN6nby7ZekQQM/yL7vuyqFwmSRTA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+mI00MdZvu6J02Xy0+9x1DGte0b1YIZshZQdphT4EqBu2ALpkSmhKKb9MdhpX+BQrwhRI6FGq+9XpQI1nkB4A= X-Received: by 10.237.33.231 with SMTP id m36mr2898221qtc.154.1523472981973; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 11:56:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.174.202 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 11:56:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20180402005248.52418-1-haraldnordgren@gmail.com> <20180409014226.2647-1-haraldnordgren@gmail.com> <20180409014226.2647-2-haraldnordgren@gmail.com> From: Eric Sunshine Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:56:21 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: FF17pDd7OXdq6K3AFrSy2BoRCjw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 2/4] ref-filter: make ref_array_item allocation more consistent To: Stefan Beller Cc: Harald Nordgren , Git List , =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= , Jeff King , Junio C Hamano Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:07 PM, Stefan Beller wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Harald Nordgren > wrote: >> There have been no new comments for the last few days. I know Jeff >> King will be away for the next two weeks, but should we still move >> forward with this? The initial reactions to the idea seemed positive. > > Please see the "What's cooking?" email on the mailing list that is > sent out periodically by Junio. > >> * jk/ref-array-push (2018-04-09) 3 commits >> - ref-filter: factor ref_array pushing into its own function >> - ref-filter: make ref_array_item allocation more consistent >> - ref-filter: use "struct object_id" consistently >> (this branch is used by hn/sort-ls-remote.) >> >> API clean-up aournd ref-filter code. >> >> Will merge to 'next'. > > It will be merged to next and if no people speak up (due to bugs > observed or such) I would guess, however, that Harald is wondering more specifically about the "--sort" patch he added atop Peff's patches. Disposition for _that_ patch is not specified in the latest "What's cooking": * hn/sort-ls-remote (2018-04-09) 1 commit - ls-remote: create '--sort' option (this branch uses jk/ref-array-push.) "git ls-remote" learned an option to allow sorting its output based on the refnames being shown.