git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Johannes Postler <johannes.postler@txture.io>,
	Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] format-patch: support --output option
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 12:27:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPig+cQ7t1by2X0xwddyo40sQdb9BPBKmERpqKR6oMD82kUwgg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201104132907.GC3030146@coredump.intra.peff.net>

On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 8:29 AM Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> [...]
> The simplest solution would be to just disallow --output with
> format-patch, as nobody ever intended it to work. However, we have
> accidentally documented it (because format-patch includes diff-options).
> And it does work with "git log", which writes the whole output to the
> specified file. It's easy enough to make that work for format-patch,
> too: it's really the same as --stdout, but pointed at a specific file.
> [...]
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
> ---
> diff --git a/builtin/log.c b/builtin/log.c
> @@ -1942,11 +1942,18 @@ int cmd_format_patch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> +       } else if (rev.diffopt.close_file) {
> +               /*
> +                * The diff code parsed --output; it has already opened the
> +                * file, but but we must instruct it not to close after each
> +                * diff.
> +                */
> +               rev.diffopt.close_file = 0;
>         } else {

The commit message's justification for supporting --output seems
reasonable. However, my knee-jerk reaction to the implementation was
that it feels overly magical and a bit too hacky. I can see the logic
in it but it also leaves a bad taste when the implementation has to
"undo" a side-effect of some other piece of code, which makes it feel
unplanned and fragile. The question which popped into my mind
immediately was "why not handle --output explicitly via
builtin_format_patch_options[] along with other first-class options?".
This review comment may or may not be actionable; it's just expressing
surprise and a bit of nose-wrinkling I experienced.

> diff --git a/t/t4014-format-patch.sh b/t/t4014-format-patch.sh
> @@ -1919,6 +1919,39 @@ test_expect_success 'format-patch -o overrides format.outputDirectory' '
> +test_expect_success 'format-patch forbids multiple outputs' '
> +       rm -fr outfile outdir &&
> +       test_must_fail \
> +               git format-patch --stdout --output=outfile &&
> +       test_must_fail \
> +               git format-patch --stdout --output-directory=outdir &&
> +       test_must_fail \
> +               git format-patch --output=outfile --output-directory=outdir
> +'

I would have expected to see this test added in patch [1/3], and then
extended by this patch with the addition of the --output case(s).

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-04 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-04 10:18 [Bug report] Crash when creating patch Johannes Postler
2020-11-04 13:24 ` Jeff King
2020-11-04 13:25   ` [PATCH 1/3] format-patch: refactor output selection Jeff King
2020-11-04 17:01     ` Eric Sunshine
2020-11-04 17:13       ` Jeff King
2020-11-04 13:27   ` [PATCH 2/3] format-patch: tie file-opening logic to output_directory Jeff King
2020-11-04 17:03     ` Eric Sunshine
2020-11-04 13:29   ` [PATCH 3/3] format-patch: support --output option Jeff King
2020-11-04 17:27     ` Eric Sunshine [this message]
2020-11-04 19:15       ` Jeff King
2020-11-04 20:16         ` Eric Sunshine
2020-11-04 18:00     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-11-04 19:26   ` [PATCH v2] format-patch --output Jeff King
2020-11-04 19:28     ` [PATCH v2 1/3] format-patch: refactor output selection Jeff King
2020-11-04 19:28     ` [PATCH v2 2/3] format-patch: tie file-opening logic to output_directory Jeff King
2020-11-04 19:28     ` [PATCH v2 3/3] format-patch: support --output option Jeff King
2020-11-05  6:30     ` [PATCH v2] format-patch --output Johannes Postler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPig+cQ7t1by2X0xwddyo40sQdb9BPBKmERpqKR6oMD82kUwgg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=johannes.postler@txture.io \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).