git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
To: David Greene <greened@obbligato.org>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>,
	"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>,
	Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a test for subtree rebase that loses commits
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:19:17 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPig+cQ6Dfvc4dkQVZ6BqzD76nZ4mCcqkO4eAecrMENKWtgWEg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452467297-16868-2-git-send-email-greened@obbligato.org>

On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 6:08 PM, David Greene <greened@obbligato.org> wrote:
> From: "David A. Greene" <greened@obbligato.org>
>
> This test merges an external tree in as a subtree, makes some commits
> on top of it and splits it back out.  In the process the added commits
> are lost or the rebase aborts with an internal error.  The tests are
> marked to expect failure so that we don't forget to fix it.

This version looks better. A few minor comments below (not necessarily
deserving a re-roll)...

> Signed-off-by: David A. Greene <greened@obbligato.org>
> ---
> diff --git a/t/t3427-rebase-subtree.sh b/t/t3427-rebase-subtree.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
> +#!/bin/sh
> +
> +test_description='git rebase tests for -Xsubtree
> +
> +This test runs git rebase and tests the subtree strategy.
> +'
> +. ./test-lib.sh
> +. "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-rebase.sh
> +
> +check_equal() {
> +       test_debug 'echo'
> +       test_debug "echo \"check a:\" \"{$1}\""
> +       test_debug "echo \"      b:\" \"{$2}\""
> +       test "$1" = "$2"
> +}

I'm still curious as to why check_equal() is preferred over
test-lib-functions.sh:verbose().

> +last_commit_message() {
> +       git log --pretty=format:%s -1
> +}
> +
> +test_expect_success 'setup' '
> +       test_commit README &&
> +       mkdir files &&
> +       (
> +               cd files &&
> +               git init &&
> +               test_commit master1 &&
> +               test_commit master2 &&
> +               test_commit master3
> +       ) &&
> +       test_debug "echo Add project master to master" &&

Are these test_debug invocations still useful now that the test has
been fully developed?

> +       git fetch files master &&
> +       git branch files-master FETCH_HEAD &&
> +       test_debug "echo Add subtree master to master via subtree" &&
> +       git read-tree --prefix=files_subtree files-master &&
> +       git checkout -- files_subtree &&
> +       tree=$(git write-tree) &&
> +       head=$(git rev-parse HEAD) &&
> +       rev=$(git rev-parse --verify files-master^0) &&
> +       commit=$(git commit-tree -p $head -p $rev -m "Add subproject master" $tree) &&
> +       git reset $commit &&
> +       (
> +               cd files_subtree &&
> +               test_commit master4
> +       ) &&
> +       test_commit files_subtree/master5
> +'
> +
> +# Does not preserve master4 and master5.

This comment is explaining why the test is marked "failure", right?
When someone gets around to fixing the breakage and toggling this to
"success", there is a reasonably good chance that the comment will be
overlooked and thus become stale. Perhaps prefixing the comment with a
bold "FAILURE:" would serve as a reminder that the comment should be
dropped when the problem is fixed?

> +test_expect_failure 'Rebase -Xsubtree --preserve-merges --onto' '
> +       reset_rebase &&
> +       git checkout -b rebase-preserve-merges master &&
> +       git filter-branch --prune-empty -f --subdirectory-filter files_subtree &&
> +       git commit -m "Empty commit" --allow-empty &&
> +       git rebase -Xsubtree=files_subtree --preserve-merges --onto files-master master &&
> +       check_equal "$(last_commit_message)" "files_subtree/master5"
> +'
> +
> +# Does not preserve master4, master5 and empty.
> +test_expect_failure 'Rebase -Xsubtree --keep-empty --preserve-merges --onto' '
> +       reset_rebase &&
> +       git checkout -b rebase-keep-empty master &&
> +       git filter-branch --prune-empty -f --subdirectory-filter files_subtree &&
> +       git commit -m "Empty commit" --allow-empty &&
> +       git rebase -Xsubtree=files_subtree --keep-empty --preserve-merges --onto files-master master &&
> +       check_equal "$(last_commit_message)" "Empty commit"
> +'
> +
> +# fatal: Could not parse object
> +test_expect_failure 'Rebase -Xsubtree --onto' '
> +       reset_rebase &&
> +       git checkout -b rebase-onto master &&
> +       git filter-branch --prune-empty -f --subdirectory-filter files_subtree &&
> +       git commit -m "Empty commit" --allow-empty &&
> +       git rebase -Xsubtree=files_subtree --onto files-master master &&
> +       check_equal "$(last_commit_message)" "Empty commit"
> +'
> +
> +test_done
> --
> 2.6.1

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-15  1:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-05  4:40 [PATCH] Test rebase -Xsubtree David Greene
2016-01-05  4:40 ` [PATCH] Add a test for subtree rebase that loses commits David Greene
2016-01-05  8:47   ` Torsten Bögershausen
2016-01-05  9:57     ` Dennis Kaarsemaker
2016-01-05 11:18       ` Torsten Bögershausen
2016-01-05 20:34   ` Eric Sunshine
2016-01-05 21:14     ` David A. Greene
2016-01-10 23:08   ` [PATCH v2] Test rebase -Xsubtree David Greene
2016-01-10 23:08     ` [PATCH] Add a test for subtree rebase that loses commits David Greene
2016-01-15  1:19       ` Eric Sunshine [this message]
2016-01-17 22:50         ` David A. Greene
2016-01-17 23:13         ` [PATCH v3 contrib/subtree 1/1] " David Greene
2016-01-17 23:32           ` Eric Sunshine
2016-01-17 23:36             ` David A. Greene
2016-01-17 23:43             ` [PATCH v4 1/1] contrib/subtree: " David Greene
2016-01-18 18:10               ` Eric Sunshine
2016-01-19  2:53                 ` David A. Greene
2016-01-19  2:59                 ` [PATCH v5 " David Greene
2016-01-19  4:21                   ` Eric Sunshine
2016-01-19 17:41                   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-20  4:10                     ` David A. Greene
2016-04-12 23:27                       ` Junio C Hamano
2016-06-28 10:55                         ` David A. Greene
2016-06-28 10:54                     ` [PATCH v6 " David Greene

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPig+cQ6Dfvc4dkQVZ6BqzD76nZ4mCcqkO4eAecrMENKWtgWEg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=greened@obbligato.org \
    --cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
    --cc=john@keeping.me.uk \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).