From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM, RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B60A20133 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2017 04:44:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751989AbdCDEof (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Mar 2017 23:44:35 -0500 Received: from mail-qk0-f170.google.com ([209.85.220.170]:36533 "EHLO mail-qk0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751560AbdCDEoe (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Mar 2017 23:44:34 -0500 Received: by mail-qk0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 1so88135532qkl.3 for ; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 20:44:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=O0AX7et7VA/udu0E7L/heCwnH5L38P+ADbcl+wowY0c=; b=FA6c6tQenl+4ITosO9oQGeEcRJRkxSCp5vVhFAhNOusETaY2BjmEdMLfqMrOjdFJUL XcC/5q/92sOW4Y6mW0+uaadtTvr1wJ17Vdw8rMG03XHOdXyW0272bXc6BIpGv5TdNrUb 4v+IJV9O420Yvsc5XH8FZUt06gkgy/HX7kufz5NxPUU/LXwonXFEqT+eRzMPX57YUIIR 5UPW9yT3fKtwNXcwtYUbdi3GSm+6uCiA0gGzZulBlTypzlG9j3oC1TZ6uZi7A8wGVKCM OXlWJUC3B5VdJcGkYLsueDH9ynm0JhbchTXu2tJe3e4DWj8/qtYNxYVdojikRjcvTx9u NIoQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=O0AX7et7VA/udu0E7L/heCwnH5L38P+ADbcl+wowY0c=; b=OTxpDkTwsBOtPZz2Uksran/Tn5ETC7wzJda5su86DhHkAGzeRxCTFnaYVr4E7FR+hF cup60+S4rznm8GhziJnJf0mlcC9tQfw+lgL7Bm0d1xscJUh6O3l92OpuDcEZYsYhTQ1T Xn8AIOFElkTVv0bfFTnbMtWWbAmku+6qCc0baEYneG1E7kX0/gVDPwrzCz4ruSI6cmcA MeCHWBMJWlUWZRbjVZv4aW3LvhzIlREZkVE7ET53EIQmjY50ORQDrz7kEHCLBBR7CiVw zZr5Y9cAgAoXQPhRUQ5gq4U6FENVIh6YRxZMpE4StqutcyprUskav/sAaV7VDmRbgGG/ kXVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lc5fbjnCf2eSNhXNeAyXqwRgFTLH/8+iaeoGKg+/HGaaMq/mVupy6eCWIw6iIWYOzCJ+x7YDpFkPDuZA== X-Received: by 10.233.232.21 with SMTP id a21mr6347245qkg.180.1488600692861; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 20:11:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.178.20 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 20:11:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20170302105157.59791-1-larsxschneider@gmail.com> From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 20:11:12 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: OUW0naAe0KZrULkmBihxk8TyytE Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Travis: also test on 32-bit Linux To: Lars Schneider , Johannes Schindelin Cc: Git Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > I only recently started looking at Travis logs, so I cannot tell if > it is just a usual flake (e.g. some builds a few days ago seems to > have failed due to not being able to check out the tree being > tested, which I do not think is our fault) that we shouldn't worry > about, or if it is a sign of a real problem. Tonight's pushout also seems to stall the same way. Dscho's unversioned one didn't exhibit the problem? https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/206811396 > Unrelated to linux-32, the same build has hard failure with Apple > clang in t0021 with the rot13-filter.pl thing, by the way. This one may be a Heisenbug which may indicate some raciness in the clean/smudge filter protocol. The latest build of 'pu' https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/207550171 seems to have passed OK.