From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [Opinion gathering] Git remote whitelist/blacklist Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 09:20:42 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1040142021.5607762.1463753271105.JavaMail.zimbra@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> <584027154.5608416.1463754104066.JavaMail.zimbra@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> <001001d1b2a3$06d7bbb0$14873310$@nexbridge.com> <1929221963.5686879.1464007899902.JavaMail.zimbra@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> <1884904685.12056.1464084750628.JavaMail.zimbra@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> <84BDC4A4-FBE1-4542-868C-FA77A25469F3@gmail.com> <002b01d1b5d7$aefd0a70$0cf71f50$@nexbridge.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Matthieu Moy , Lars Schneider , Francois Beutin , Git Mailing List , simon rabourg , wiliam duclot , antoine queru To: "Randall S. Becker" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 24 18:21:10 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b5F4v-0005nU-Qd for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 18:21:10 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752967AbcEXQVE (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2016 12:21:04 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f170.google.com ([209.85.161.170]:34325 "EHLO mail-yw0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752038AbcEXQVD (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2016 12:21:03 -0400 Received: by mail-yw0-f170.google.com with SMTP id c127so20939225ywb.1 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 09:21:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=MyADEmU+/Dg5vvoBSON3nRmYMbJORI0lutfCZhEkbOE=; b=cZMqC/NymlyjnjEnHznEb9cLMVi2Fg8a+znukISxvO91jPrY9Eb9tztluJA8zLHhxa N7fwHETQYSgKAYd5sXhvggS1Judq+peZ5XqCnbuKajnf97MrKXZVvyA8AptPAKOYPRbu 017L30NN1ocaQD+0YTotBlpEj+niICQfTe10RZ6nzGietCLptrW88wfqhH5CNg7Oahji gyYjsJ010rWI/APQ8R5HRymapSJk9ZPmifKmiDiQb/KqQIDbVZuviGJnQ27pw59Vl2YT e51j3Aa54Si6oCl8F5u0KusLknEbw+RAQBQ8ZmCG6ae6lFewt7FsV+Rtl203PfqwAr9g 31Mg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MyADEmU+/Dg5vvoBSON3nRmYMbJORI0lutfCZhEkbOE=; b=QUb2RvKY2TRP/PnM2u98yB25lw6jyTFQ4OTnqERFS15IuFCMeemjzPWXPTO1h62pgo tCsMcRIvnf5G5f3dFhPKOc9KKmEkYW/5DVGX2BHojuRqEvjU6MPqYuBim7tit19j8OYW AKx9FLKU4zuo1HTAZnVMiua3hx0vLv/iw0xnLqoWesX3asct9t0lLKSezRZ9wcDDo606 IxeUTQflOT16fUmNKbao6ZUeNM3S4VZ65oItz+6v9Vf12quvrnkTafD+XS3ucseSxmEQ iUQe/JS9BZR/jBvlUrA+LuD9XOk0unAwBxgtxl+nBFGLrH1+tW6u/XQ7fQvhn1G385Rk RD8w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKFicy7jLKIU03vu2Sach9xtbZ1FtaSkVzGuNcixuOhohcwGbS0iGSi3+F0VNfnQmFBdJJAY0cr63gNKA== X-Received: by 10.13.215.136 with SMTP id z130mr1933056ywd.278.1464106862067; Tue, 24 May 2016 09:21:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.13.251.71 with HTTP; Tue, 24 May 2016 09:20:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <002b01d1b5d7$aefd0a70$0cf71f50$@nexbridge.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: zMKg5hFk0kqxQcUxveWRb6If1kw Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Randall S. Becker wrote: > May be missing the point, but isn't the original intent to provide policy-based to control the push I didn't get the impression that those who are proposing were interested in a "policy that you have to obey" at all. Isn't this more about "I often by mistake say 'git push foo' which I want to prevent"? At least that was the impression I was getting.