From: Erin Dahlgren <eedahlgren@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Simplify handling of setup_git_directory_gently() failure cases.
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 12:54:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP_Smy14j4WK-mkqdKTKue=j7YoNjfaZVCBA-7S8xwNqX2rKhQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181218175418.GB31070@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Hi Peff,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 9:54 AM Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 05:05:08PM -0800, Erin Dahlgren wrote:
>
> > setup_git_directory_gently() expects two types of failures to
> > discover a git directory (e.g. .git/):
> > [...]
>
> When I read your subject line, I'll admit to having a funny feeling in
> the pit of my stomach. This setup code has historically been full of
> subtle corner cases, and I expected a very tricky review.
>
> However, your explanation was so well-written that it was a pleasure to
> read. :)
Thanks :)
>
> > Before this change are two misleading additional behaviors:
> >
> > - GIT_DIR_HIT_CEILING: setup_nongit() changes to the cwd for no
> > apparent reason. We never had the chance to change directories
> > up to this point so chdir(current cwd) is pointless.
>
> That makes sense. I think this is a holdover from when we used to walk
> backwards via chdir(), prior to ce9b8aab5d (setup_git_directory_1():
> avoid changing global state, 2017-03-13). Back then, we needed to
> restore the state at this point, but now we don't.
>
> > - GIT_DIR_HIT_MOUNT_POINT: strbuf_release() frees the buffer
> > of a static struct strbuf (cwd). This is unnecessary because the
> > struct is static so its buffer is always reachable. This is also
> > misleading because nowhere else in the function is this buffer
> > released.
>
> Makes sense.
>
> I do have one question, though:
>
> > case GIT_DIR_HIT_CEILING:
> > - prefix = setup_nongit(cwd.buf, nongit_ok);
> > - break;
> > + if (!nongit_ok)
> > + die(_("not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): %s"),
> >a + DEFAULT_GIT_DIR_ENVIRONMENT);
> > + *nongit_ok = 1;
> > + strbuf_release(&dir);
> > + return NULL;
>
> This case used to break out of the switch, and now returns early.
>
> So we do not execute the later code which clears GIT_PREFIX_ENVIRONMENT,
> and zeroes the fields in startup_info. Those probably don't matter in
> most cases, but I wonder if there are some obscure ones where it might.
>
> Might it make sense to make GIT_DIR_HIT_MOUNT_POINT more like
> GIT_DIR_HIT_CEILING currently is, rather than the other way around?
> I.e., something like:
>
> case GIT_DIR_HIT_CEILING:
> if (!nongit_ok)
> die(...);
> *nongit_ok = 1;
> prefix = NULL;
> break;
> case GIT_DIR_HIT_MOUNT_POINT:
> if (!nongit_ok)
> die(...);
> *nongit_ok = 1;
> prefix = NULL;
> break;
>
> ?
After some digging, there seems to be a documented guarantee that
"`GIT_PREFIX` is set as returned by running 'git rev-parse
--show-prefix'". See Documentation/config/alias.txt. If the
environment variable GIT_PREFIX is already set to something and we
don't clear it when prefix is NULL, then the two can be out of sync.
So that's a problem with my patch and the current handling of
GIT_DIR_HIT_MOUNT_POINT. I'm not sure how important of a guarantee it
is, but we should respect what's documented.
Side note: One of the secondary goals of my patch was to make it
really obvious that neither the GIT_DIR_HIT_CEILING nor the
GIT_DIR_HIT_MOUNT_POINT case can get us into the block protected by
(startup_info->have_repository || getenv(GIT_DIR_ENVIRONMENT)). With
your suggestion (and it's a fair one) I don't think that's feasible
without more significant refactoring. Should I just settle with a
comment that explains this?
Thanks,
Erin
>
> -Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-18 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-13 17:30 [PATCH] Simplify handling of setup_git_directory_gently() failure cases Erin Dahlgren
2018-12-14 10:32 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-12-16 1:05 ` Erin Dahlgren
2018-12-16 1:05 ` [PATCH v2] " Erin Dahlgren
2018-12-18 12:35 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-12-18 19:50 ` Erin Dahlgren
2018-12-18 17:54 ` Jeff King
2018-12-18 20:54 ` Erin Dahlgren [this message]
2018-12-19 15:59 ` Jeff King
2018-12-26 22:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-12-27 16:24 ` Jeff King
2018-12-27 23:46 ` Erin Dahlgren
2019-01-03 4:54 ` Jeff King
2018-12-27 23:36 ` [PATCH v3] " Erin Dahlgren
2019-01-03 5:14 ` Jeff King
2019-01-03 18:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-01-04 8:25 ` Jeff King
2019-01-05 16:57 ` Erin Dahlgren
2019-01-06 6:22 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAP_Smy14j4WK-mkqdKTKue=j7YoNjfaZVCBA-7S8xwNqX2rKhQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=eedahlgren@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).