From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53C81F66E for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:46:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727851AbgH0Tq3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:46:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51230 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726894AbgH0Tq2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:46:28 -0400 Received: from mail-vk1-xa36.google.com (mail-vk1-xa36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a36]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C88CEC061264 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:46:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vk1-xa36.google.com with SMTP id m12so1524319vko.5 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:46:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wwermHRiym3rpWn/ZetDriAzbRx1BpUyjyc9p2jl4Qk=; b=C4whFcg9uuW7RxeGg5iWFoeCRINAhr2N+URw5YwIxm5yzqGQwjMYK5w8RNmgTRjZ49 0Nvgp2RE4Ep7+j1mlCWLj2huuLEW4bFJat6aN9/KJCPliBEZAPGdWG9aKFQVVkwqK36m 70NYBy80U6orLVOgbNr7cbSI2e1b6l+OeQOAYtFLQWeHtPPL9w980o625FFUcDt1KPav iD5IZKziQs0RFo5jpP2Um8RBob2F6UZiI9FNukgwqsq25M3KOeZg0+UMMpM0p+DwUGPS 6sHmlxbo3TKO2kwdw6iVloj0xiZeVJQSkxS+/sstgB7kdGw8t//1vnjWvRJQ2zDM5YMp ffDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wwermHRiym3rpWn/ZetDriAzbRx1BpUyjyc9p2jl4Qk=; b=hTkqhgoIkuYOFteHP7g0nMSljhNZv1knREmSxLrpzW36re1vIZ/9CHTn5U6W7MK+Zr VMUzJo75MumKo/AH6A5uoksaV5cPqNDedyzeDuZGsyRWdf/mEWVvd2bQiSauExEawNjs cYamzbfozGZzGY7MSiTzKOG7vJmtkAZoIQkk9tQznX/4xS9ywMD6NHV+e2zIV1YzfP3C J6wvdODtjSLI+XGNvly/QeNKTE+v7RGirN4EjchKM2rTX95swxKFS9Iv7QAWKGCAdAFc JqYLPyHABQpieHyT/5aAzbmPpjF+lTtS9I8tbCfK54MSA5Hch0ViUz4rSZdUjHJiGTWN M/RQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530pIYkyeRhw2grO2Apeubd9oD6d5wvgBu3VAehvl2fkz6dBwSdD qjoYW+hmB1ExrKJflkdnBlS0OGasCjmTzA0QCeU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwr33ncjgpKjQ+g2eV6RybLCJarVNJLm995/bSOr/T+AQbAVljpZ/QRLf3BuSmf8zEASD5siHoPpFaALjDxWr4= X-Received: by 2002:ac5:c4e9:: with SMTP id b9mr10103940vkl.67.1598557586399; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:46:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Carlo Arenas Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:46:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] send-email: do not prompt for In-Reply-To To: Drew DeVault Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:35 PM Drew DeVault wrote: > Do you think this whole workstream could be averted by dropping the > $prompting check in the in-reply-to branch? > > Or would that still constitute a breaking change to user workflows? I think the "breaking change" is changing the default (which needs fixing as well). but an interesting idea would be to add a config so the prompting could be skipped which would be something that people could add to their per repository config (as needed). Carlo