From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9646D1F5AE for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 01:08:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726908AbgFZBIg (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2020 21:08:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32896 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726252AbgFZBIg (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2020 21:08:36 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-xe41.google.com (mail-vs1-xe41.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e41]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17A0BC08C5C1 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:08:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vs1-xe41.google.com with SMTP id r5so4613289vso.11 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:08:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LHwbBt2FXmgM0vgfIM7i9SjLQ3PWgD5w7XwsEAtk5Tc=; b=JkaVUW8OsuyuB7KzWQGoNgs6r2ybvrdKu7XNDd51w4qvYUD05cWfylzgfMu/OMIPzd ITL1DQBSRgq5MZkAbs55grJFdCdJDjPgdGLd1JuoGeuVx+M+lSRxG/ur+ZwZlWpqerDY CBdIXS2Z1vujE+0gaKbOEt8xKh/A8vM1Qn2sFgWRWy2eULmWyAVTpYYY9rsxnDatINRx KzsSaY9bmHi0w+LL6bA1LJ/RnvWu3oe+cL++BlMKRenJpc/IBaC/bu4O88prVhSicuBw CZdUbLszeUxpuC6I/cr1peHaJCY3ydlJLYK/nuxLOdOIqF8Kldn4ZV0yX869YCRIxg4s t2ng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LHwbBt2FXmgM0vgfIM7i9SjLQ3PWgD5w7XwsEAtk5Tc=; b=PPLBgNjay/3IMhuDJH/oroh6EZcXqic0JRDUU5/fqcvUuTXCi8ast0JZYHdKmh/gwM vGbdyRYX64UCTfbLCStVfpyUoIO9K7459hPKJYhHBFCpmBuFW1z47uiH2MuqTQOwW6C3 axFg+W0p5qgxn5sLfXsm4cVOmgcwTRcX1gsD7di9uAl0rclnX7BeO+LC+MCyFOVj5DND cApc2oTCO9u/Rqot7k4G2dBLzT/8gu06BSK3+AhWoJOA9erxiD0vKqur+RpbirIdS9Fg 23tofTf5n7soL8foU+XOljMmUerSzIMB7LP4cWI/SSf9W5WohF+iGeWXU1fTPpLMurKf n3fQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532h3wbGrN+oYmOdykeoZqLcltWNMdm8XJ+HgCrZFqqipQeL5BLl 8ME6oDgDBu2BsikYGT0wive1zK+wuDy+ioskngF9JArV X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzMTKqxjErOdh4CY50f34roSFHyRNH3IBLp9lWt7B7NWXCdOg48v6gvmBG8YCI6g/nzs1shL84d994IcXv6M/w= X-Received: by 2002:a67:ea08:: with SMTP id g8mr714824vso.7.1593133715165; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:08:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200624195520.2062298-1-aquini@redhat.com> <20200624234539.GH1987277@optiplex-lnx> <20200625184715.GC2117795@optiplex-lnx> In-Reply-To: <20200625184715.GC2117795@optiplex-lnx> From: Carlo Arenas Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:08:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] send-email: restore --in-reply-to superseding behavior To: Rafael Aquini Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org a test case in t/t9001-send-email.sh will also help, as I am not sure this might be "expected behaviour" as hinted in the man page for git-send-email (under --thread): "It is up to the user to ensure that no In-Reply-To header already exists exists when git send-email is asked to add it (especially note that git format-patch can be configured to do the threading itself). Failure to do so may not produce the expected result in the recipient's MUA." Carlo