Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] doc/git-commit: add documentation for fixup=[amend|reword] options

[Charvi Mendiratta <charvi077@gmail.com>]

On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 02:18, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Charvi Mendiratta <charvi077@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > +--fixup=[(amend|reword):]<commit>::
> > +     When used without options, lets's say `git commit --fixup=<commit>`,
> > +     it creates a "fixup!" commit where the commit message will be
>
> Be careful to use word 'option' that refers to something other than
> what a casual reader would think of an `--option` in the description
> of the `--fixup` option.
>
>         Without `amend:` or `reword:`, create a `fixup!` commit where...
>
> would be sufficient, no?
>

Okay, I agree this is more clear.

> > +     the subject line from the specified commit with a prefix of
> > +     "fixup! ". The resulting "fixup!" commit is further used with
> > +     `git rebase --autosquash` to fixup the content of the specified
> > +     commit.
> > ++
> > +When used with option `amend`, let's say `git commit --fixup=amend:<commit>`,
> > +it creates a "amend!" commit to fixup both the content and the commit log
>
>         The `--fixup=amend:<commit>` form creates an "amend!" commit to...
>
> > +message of the specified commit. The resulting "amend!" commit's commit
> > +message subject will be the subject line from the specified commit with a
> > +prefix of "amend! " and the message body will be commit log message of the
>
> While that SP inside the double-quote may be technically more
> correct (and it was inherited from the original), I think with 'a
> prefix of "amend!"' is still understandable and a lot easier to
> read, especially because you'd mention "amend!"  a few more times in
> the same paragraph below.
>
> The same comment applies to "fixup! " above.
>

Okay, I will fix it.


> > +specified commit. It also invokes an editor seeded with the "amend!" commit
> > +log message to allow to edit further. And it denies to create "amend!" commit
>
> "amend!" commit log message -> log message of the "amend!" commit
>
> denies -> refuses
>
> > +if it's commit message body is empty unless used with `allow-empty-message`
> > +option. "amend!" commit when rebased with `--autosquash` will fixup the
>
> with the `--allow-empty-message` option.
>
> > +contents and replace the commit message of the specified commit with the
> > +"amend!" commit's message body.
> > ++
> > +When used with alternative option `reword`, let's say
> > +`git commit --fixup=reword:<commit>`, it works similar to `amend` option, but
> > +here it creates an empty "amend!" commit, i.e it does not take any staged
>
>         The `--fixup=reword:<commit>` form creates an `amend!`
>         commit similar to `--fixup=amend:<commit>` creates, but it
>         records the same tree as `HEAD`, i.e. it does not ...
>

Thanks for pointing out these changes. I agree these are more clear
and will fix them all.

> > +changes and only allows to fixup the commit message of the specified commit.
> > +It will reword the specified commit when it is rebased with `--autosquash`.
> > ++
> > +Unlike `--fixup` without options, `--fixup=[amend/reword]:` is incompatible with
> > +`-m` commit message option.
>
>         The `--fixup=amend:` and `--fixup=reword:` forms cannot be
>         used with other options to add to the commit log message,
>         e.g. `-m`.
>
> Again, why is `-m` so special?  Shouldn't -F/-c/-C also be
> incompatible?
>

Yes, they are also incompatible. I thought to highlight -m because `--fixup`
allows the `-m` but I agree to reword it in above way with slight change :
s/e.g. `-m`/i.e it is incompatible with `-m`/`-F`/`-c`/`-C` options.