From: Tao Klerks <tao@klerks.biz>
To: git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Subject: Re: Is "bare"ness in the context of multiple worktrees weird? Bitmap error in git gc.
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 17:29:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPMMpohpKJdopSpZu+ehE0MZrH8cksgtY1NEHFyZz2jj+LOKhA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPMMpoj7s=ewXJfJyxvrcHjpmOOWEWBvZ94OOuVmYs2UQ482HA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 4:59 PM Tao Klerks <tao@klerks.biz> wrote:
>
>
> It seems, to me, that "my setup" makes a lot more sense than what you
> end up with when you use "--separate-git-dir", and that the behavior
> there predates the current "mutual reference" model of
> worktrees-to-their-repo. If "my" use of "core.bare" in the example
> above is sound - then should the implementation of
> "--separate-git-dir" be changed to produce a bare repo with a
> "worktrees" folder, like you get if you clone bare and add a worktree
> in two separate steps?
>
And to confuse matters further, I just stumbled across
https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/contrib/workdir/git-new-workdir
- I don't understand when you would want to use that vs, again, a bare
repo with one or more worktrees properly attached via two-way
references, their own indexes, their own reflogs, etc.
Is it the case that this contrib script predates the current "git
worktree" support?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-04 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-04 14:41 Is "bare"ness in the context of multiple worktrees weird? Bitmap error in git gc Tao Klerks
2023-09-04 14:59 ` Tao Klerks
2023-09-04 15:29 ` Tao Klerks [this message]
2023-09-04 17:42 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2023-09-04 17:56 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2023-09-05 0:38 ` Eric Sunshine
2023-09-06 16:00 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2023-09-06 16:39 ` Sergey Organov
2023-09-06 17:59 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2023-09-06 18:04 ` Tao Klerks
2023-09-06 20:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-09-06 22:00 ` Sergey Organov
2023-09-06 22:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-09-06 22:34 ` Sergey Organov
2023-09-07 4:53 ` Tao Klerks
2023-09-07 6:33 ` Sergey Organov
2023-09-07 20:11 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2023-09-07 15:07 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2023-09-07 18:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-09-06 17:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-09-06 18:08 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2023-09-06 19:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-09-06 22:11 ` Sergey Organov
2023-09-05 15:48 ` Tao Klerks
2023-09-05 0:26 ` Eric Sunshine
2023-09-05 1:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-09-05 5:43 ` Eric Sunshine
2023-09-05 15:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-09-05 16:25 ` Tao Klerks
2023-09-06 17:29 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2023-09-05 16:10 ` Tao Klerks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPMMpohpKJdopSpZu+ehE0MZrH8cksgtY1NEHFyZz2jj+LOKhA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tao@klerks.biz \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).