Re: [PATCH v2] SubmittingPatches: add section about AI

[Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Oct 3, 2025 at 10:48 PM Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2025 at 2:37 PM brian m. carlson
> <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> wrote:

> > We could say something like this:
> >
> >   Please do not sign off your work if you’re using an LLM to contribute
> >   unless you have included copyright and license information for all the
> >   code used in that LLM.
>
> Would this mean that you wanted to ban contributions like d12166d3c8bb
> (Merge branch 'en/docfixes', 2023-10-23), available on the list over
> at https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.1595.git.1696747527.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/
> ?   We don't need to go theoretical, I've already contributed such a
> patch series before -- 2 years ago -- and it was merged.  Granted,
> that was entirely documentation, and I called out the usage of AI in
> the cover letter, and I manually checked every change (discarding many
> of them) and split it into commits on my own, could easily explain any
> change and why it was good, etc.  And I was upfront about all of it.

This is a good example why we don't want to ban any use of generated AI. Thanks.

> If any use of AI is bad, do we need to revert that series?