git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Miriam Rubio <mirucam@gmail.com>, git <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>,
	Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>,
	Tanushree Tumane <tanushreetumane@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/29] bisect: libify `bisect_next_all`
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 08:15:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP8UFD3QP3QXe32cdK+q=P+v3dK1Bfws5KgNnm-JfDnPkpBZfw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2001202325000.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>

On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:29 PM Johannes Schindelin
<Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, Miriam Rubio wrote:

> > Since we want to get rid of git-bisect.sh it would be necessary to
> > convert those exit() calls to return statements so that errors can be
> > reported.
> >
> > Emulate try catch in C by converting `exit(<positive-value>)` to
> > `return <negative-value>`. Follow POSIX conventions to return
> > <negative-value> to indicate error.
> >
> > Turn `exit()` to `return` calls in `bisect_next_all()`.
> >
> > All the functions calling `bisect_next_all()` are already able to
> > handle return values from it.
>
> So this patch brings more magic values that really would like to become
> `enum` values. At this point, we're talking about `bisect_next_all()`
> which is _not_ a file-local (`static`) function. Therefore, we now really
> wade into API territory where an `enum` is no longer just a nice thing,
> but a necessary thing: `bisect_next_all()` is a function that can be
> called from other source files.

I agree that return values could be better documented. About enum
though, I am perhaps wrong but I don't think that we use them often
for error codes. Do you have examples in the code base where they are
used for such a purpose along with regular `error(...)` calls?

> As far as I can see, this patch concludes the "libify" part of the patch
> series (read: it would have been the second patch series I would have
> suggested to split out from an otherwise too-long-to-be-reviewed set of
> patches, if I had been your mentor),

I am ok with saying that "part 1" stops after this patch and that the
rest will be "part 2" and will not be resent in the version 2 of the
"part 1" patch series, but will rather be resent later, when "part 1"
will be in next for example.

> and I'll leave it at that for
> tonight; Hopefully I will find some time to review more of these patches
> tomorrow.

That would be great!

Thanks,
Christian.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-21  7:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-20 14:37 [Outreachy][PATCH 00/29] Finish converting git bisect to C part 1 Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 01/29] bisect--helper: convert `vocab_*` char pointers to char arrays Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 02/29] bisect--helper: change `retval` to `res` Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 03/29] bisect: use the standard 'if (!var)' way to check for 0 Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 04/29] run-command: make `exists_in_PATH()` non-static Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 05/29] bisect--helper: introduce new `decide_next()` function Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 06/29] bisect: libify `exit_if_skipped_commits` to `error_if_skipped*` and its dependents Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 21:57   ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-01-21  6:40     ` Christian Couder
2020-01-21 10:00       ` Miriam R.
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 07/29] bisect: libify `bisect_checkout` Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 08/29] bisect: libify `check_merge_bases` and its dependents Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 22:09   ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-01-21  9:59     ` Miriam R.
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 09/29] bisect: libify `check_good_are_ancestors_of_bad` " Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 22:20   ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-01-21  6:59     ` Christian Couder
2020-01-21 10:00       ` Miriam R.
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 10/29] bisect: libify `handle_bad_merge_base` " Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 22:23   ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-01-21  7:05     ` Christian Couder
2020-01-21 10:00       ` Miriam R.
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 11/29] bisect: libify `bisect_next_all` Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 22:29   ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-01-21  7:15     ` Christian Couder [this message]
2020-01-30 15:18       ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 12/29] bisect--helper: reimplement `bisect_next` and `bisect_auto_next` shell functions in C Miriam Rubio
2020-01-30 22:47   ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-01-31 10:53     ` Miriam R.
2020-02-17  7:20     ` Christian Couder
2020-02-17 22:00       ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 13/29] bisect--helper: finish porting `bisect_start()` to C Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 14/29] bisect--helper: retire `--bisect-clean-state` subcommand Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 15/29] bisect--helper: retire `--next-all` subcommand Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 16/29] bisect--helper: reimplement `bisect_autostart` shell function in C Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 17/29] bisect--helper: reimplement `bisect_state` & `bisect_head` shell functions " Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 18/29] bisect--helper: retire `--check-expected-revs` subcommand Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 19/29] bisect--helper: retire `--write-terms` subcommand Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 20/29] bisect--helper: reimplement `bisect_log` shell function in C Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 21/29] bisect--helper: reimplement `bisect_replay` " Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 22/29] bisect--helper: retire `--bisect-write` subcommand Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 23/29] bisect--helper: use `res` instead of return in BISECT_RESET case option Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 24/29] bisect--helper: retire `--bisect-autostart` subcommand Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 25/29] bisect--helper: retire `--bisect-auto-next` subcommand Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 26/29] bisect--helper: reimplement `bisect_skip` shell function in C Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 27/29] bisect--helper: retire `--check-and-set-terms` subcommand Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH 28/29] bisect--helper: reimplement `bisect_visualize()`shell function in C Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 14:38 ` [PATCH 29/29] bisect--helper: reimplement `bisect_run` shell " Miriam Rubio
2020-01-20 21:41 ` [Outreachy][PATCH 00/29] Finish converting git bisect to C part 1 Johannes Schindelin
2020-01-20 23:24   ` Christian Couder
2020-01-30 15:12     ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-01-30 21:12       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-01-21  8:44   ` Miriam R.
2020-01-30 15:13     ` Johannes Schindelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAP8UFD3QP3QXe32cdK+q=P+v3dK1Bfws5KgNnm-JfDnPkpBZfw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mirucam@gmail.com \
    --cc=pranit.bauva@gmail.com \
    --cc=tanushreetumane@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).