From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719341FE90 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:10:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1032265AbdDUHKb (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Apr 2017 03:10:31 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f47.google.com ([209.85.215.47]:33184 "EHLO mail-lf0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S945680AbdDUHKa (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Apr 2017 03:10:30 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-f47.google.com with SMTP id 88so40217102lfr.0 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:10:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rLprq2LS4Lwhbuj8n+SnPGWMoJeZ/iVw3XM9MS9QUsY=; b=YkD0UCKMSTsG2z9YMEdhv7USZlk/zm3f61lgXw7KgkPJ1feKj/0w8vRatYCBY5bhG6 Lruc4KQUGYVs0dtK0s9rUNWFMYWe9ssMnXheUv0m8a4Ij5sjsVZs/ULGiPBW6Pga9FXp A0eQlOqzQ7QutZlPY7sXiDUm7hUj3vHZjlYbIbhkYMWEvyGw7Dzw2zHPt0TRHRkjpjiv 2aGE9EC/Y0FJ5mbcZHJyZBu5/GGszoP4S0f3MJUpUag70QRObGVZMu7WjF85raUIDWL7 ho+w0lAjO6C/NSp5IJNcnCVSshSCvFK80IOWrwQg6RdBJEt8pB4/r2aZgoZtTVsBIJ4a gdRQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rLprq2LS4Lwhbuj8n+SnPGWMoJeZ/iVw3XM9MS9QUsY=; b=uGJb7Vv3q/WmyjoiUuOvBTBXBCahu+hTgVswfsea/dsTdeKJRvMawTH9ooMzbow8Gw f5mb8jhsQLb7Qt6tWWo4FWKdcyt1OzgVxPbOBigxj3LR7tHfCvGDWjLjcqZyJtrmonhi MWk64shUe7d49OkUzOv/O5Rhs59nJqrzdA3XjkeGEfd+Onq7oL4KKrSixYcb65A1SHK9 yR9EtjQLiDfW1LxPLRYtmT1wq0Dsm2BRX4rOS5B84I5o+ASoK8UfQTFKcnpSv5JsMUvP Tm6Jv6KRXtnRQBGimwf/HtQY5Sgcvyz5upBjmtnetSOAVxCSigzlH0I6NMrOfqasZd9R vmtg== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/5nNXj+w2Hl2lU4fdUtK+e5H2Ony1VOEJDzLQdpQlzKSCsFokMW ZcidYsSNbioeOi/vPfm8kx5HNcGxrg== X-Received: by 10.25.18.211 with SMTP id 80mr3837700lfs.129.1492758628648; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:10:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.67.78 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:10:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170420212436.GC4989@hank> References: <20170420205214.GB4989@hank> <20170420212436.GC4989@hank> From: Christian Couder Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:10:28 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [BUG] test suite broken with GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX To: Thomas Gummerer Cc: git Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Thomas Gummerer wrote: > On 04/20, Christian Couder wrote: >> >> Could you try with the following patch: >> >> http://public-inbox.org/git/20170330210354.20018-1-chriscool@tuxfamily.org/ > > Yeah, I tried with and without that patch with the same result. > Unless I'm screwing something up when testing I don't think this fixes > the issue unfortunately. Ok, I will take a look soon. By the way I think that GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX has become redundant now that there is core.splitIndex. So perhaps in the long run it will be best to deprecate GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX and eventually remove it.