From: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Eric Sunshine" <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
"Git List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Christian Couder" <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf/aggregate: tighten option parsing
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:55:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP8UFD1nkNEbbERvyhSGfSLBDNfD8QcmrYNRy_3J4Mrb7z2ekw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqd0ytb4le.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 5:50 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> Not necessarily worth a re-roll.
>>
>> Not that it matters in this case, but just as a bit of Perl rx pedantry,
>> yes his is tighter & more correct. You didn't consider how "." interacts
>> with newlines:
>>
>> $ perl -wE 'my @rx = (qr/^--./, qr/^--.+$/, qr/^--./m, qr/^--.+$/m, qr/^--./s, qr/^--.+$/s); for (@rx) { my $s = "--foo\n--bar"; say $_, "\t", ($s =~ $_ ? 1 : 0) }'
>> (?^u:^--.) 1
>> (?^u:^--.+$) 0
>> (?^um:^--.) 1
>> (?^um:^--.+$) 1
>> (?^us:^--.) 1
>> (?^us:^--.+$) 1
>>
>> I don't think it matters here, not like someone will pass \n in options
>> to aggregate.perl...
>
> Hmph, do we want the command not to barf when "--foo\n--bar" is
> given from the command line and we cannot find such an option?
>
> I thought that the location the match under discussion is used does
> want to see a hit with any option looking string that begins with
> double dashes. I would have expected "tigher and hence incorrect",
> in other words.
>
> Somewhat puzzled...
I guess it might be better at this point to just "use Getopt::Long;"
(along with "Getopt::Long::Configure qw/ pass_through /;") as git
send-email does. It might avoid mistakes and subtle discussions like
the above.
Thanks for the reviews,
Christian.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-25 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-20 12:10 [PATCH v1] perf/aggregate: tighten option parsing Christian Couder
2018-04-20 17:46 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-04-20 18:27 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-04-21 3:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-04-25 12:55 ` Christian Couder [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAP8UFD1nkNEbbERvyhSGfSLBDNfD8QcmrYNRy_3J4Mrb7z2ekw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).