Re: [GSoC][RFC v3] Proposal: Improve consistency of sequencer commands

[Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>]

Hi Rohit,

On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 2:17 PM Rohit Ashiwal <rohit.ashiwal265@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 09:15:30 +0200 Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > As we are close to the deadline (April 9th) for proposal submissions,
> > I think it's a good idea to already upload your draft proposal on the
> > GSoC site. I think you will be able to upload newer versions until the
> > deadline, but uploading soon avoid possible last minute issues and
> > mistakes.
>
> Sure, I'll upload my proposal as soon as possible.

Great!

> > It looks like you copy pasted the Git Rev News article without
> > updating the content. The improvement has been released a long time
> > ago.
>
> The intention was to document how the project started and *major* milestones or
> turning points of the project. Here they are.

Yeah, the intention is good, though it would be nice if the details
were a bit more polished.

> > Maybe s/rebases/rebase/
>
> Yes, :P
>
> > It seems to me that there has been more recent work than this and also
> > perhaps interesting suggestions and discussions about possible
> > sequencer related  improvements on the mailing list.
>
> Again the idea was to document earlier stages of project, "recent" discussions
> have been on the optimizations which are not exactly relevant.

I think there were ideas (from Elijah) about using the sequencer in
the regular (non interactive) rebase too.

> Should I write more about recent developments?

I think Alban's GSoC project was relevant too.

So yeah, if you have time after uploading your proposal to the GSoC
web site, it would be nice if you can update it with a bit more
information about what happened recently.

Thanks,
Christian.