From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E901F6C1 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:32:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754853AbcHZGcD (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2016 02:32:03 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f193.google.com ([209.85.216.193]:33647 "EHLO mail-qt0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751321AbcHZGcB (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2016 02:32:01 -0400 Received: by mail-qt0-f193.google.com with SMTP id j37so2604345qta.0 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 23:32:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KgCf4bM0JCF22yYPkLHNSx66VmSbWT2HfsdJuL0fFMw=; b=ZG8RcDyo0uUGqdcVVrUEqtois+JZ6/tGYu/K2qXWIz5srWbLcxWz9KEDidjUmj7WRf srkwF8OEyAErOhUe3yVN0Kek7yhzPLhLlla8l/mNrsqTwQgtL4wqnKUiH7NwD2Pfd92x 88n/hwMtXRifcHCQortiTPgSpw8uLrERy6BlTHvcXZX1jnduo4779mxCxyxTlFMlOSgc aFt8J2Rb9I1xdGksT6LdJQU9jJs30+NlHd5j1XYILCthtmH5fpJrLgtUdbaTHIBNw8Eh ITdqkfMsd4YiIn6hdyK2zqKvu+7o+ENDhgg5RgZDc0TVVRmWvAMr+b+y/58r6f+ZENHS q2eg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KgCf4bM0JCF22yYPkLHNSx66VmSbWT2HfsdJuL0fFMw=; b=jNM73IbvPWXMC4c6mdin+jXbwUnCr+7imYAhh6RZkPeOT/2Qn+IDopkKmteQUPtQCw pHvnSg05dyApRoKX+yoqcIx/j0qxInaI4oaD50DRY98QBm6OqYrU5M2HFapw17rEpgug 262zDi46jmqQQSC3m6XdCdah3xnsRYNq38MEJlX5aHlRgD7XfbgCwpFg+vb387d+XU8U I5mahsF0ZDxAjfTQUpny/ywUBVxG90/CwZ16BrhNXGKsjyIiHV5oWRDCH/fwfjbVlusg ZavQmfY8dGEM+4ZHJOybejADssVmZSQ7BzwIca89EMahgpXhi/z2eGPPrLRZZyZ/rpHQ BCNA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNDReUefTMCIJMGZBJXZrInsl2O2EqYcTcjyLMm4NpRhinM2uF6mLxvW0udgy+f8VXP1n7xFSW4pYnarg== X-Received: by 10.200.48.146 with SMTP id v18mr1457590qta.107.1472193120143; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 23:32:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.42.82 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 23:31:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20160822173528.755-1-oystwa@gmail.com> <20160824180730.mqlvhkthg4imd2vy@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160824183358.ahxcgcrg7jo2rygp@sigill.intra.peff.net> From: Karthik Nayak Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:01:29 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] for-each-ref: add %(upstream:gone) to mark missing refs To: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=98ystein_Walle?= Cc: Jeff King , Git Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hello, >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Jeff King wrote: >>> >>> Ah, right. I was feeling like this was all vaguely familiar. I think >>> it would be better to push forward kn/ref-filter-branch-list. >>> According to the last "what's cooking", I think that topic is waiting >>> on more review. If you're willing and able to do so, that would be a >>> big help. >>> >> >> It's been waiting for review for a _long_ time now. >> > > To be perfectly honest my C skills and familiarity with the git source > code is not much to speak of. I very much want to take a close look but > I cannot promise anything worth your time... > > But if I do find something I'd like to point out should I just reply > directly to the e-mails containing the patches as one usually does even > though they're months old at this point? > Not that your review would be absolute but it definitely would be a start. Replying directly to the patches is the way to go I feel. -- Regards, Karthik Nayak