git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com>
To: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Cc: ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
	Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 21:34:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOLTT8RPrtgcsrrdPwNTcD2WUozThaN_QRYu+JOO2er0F8a8-w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <220624.86letmi383.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> 于2022年6月24日周五 21:46写道:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 21 2022, ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget wrote:
>
> > From: ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com>
> > [...]
>
> In my mind almost the entire point of a --format is that you can
> e.g. \0-delimit it, and don't need to do other parsing games.
>
> So this really should be adding just e.g. "%x", not "flags: %x",
>

Yeah, I admit that there really shouldn't use extra formatting here.

> Similarly, let's no have :-delimited fields. First, for a formatted
> number "1656077225:850723245" is just bizarre for %(ctime), let's use
> ".", not ":", so: "1656077225.850723245".
>
> And let's call that %(ctime), then have (which is trivial to add) a
> %(ctime:sec) and %(ctime:nsec), so someone who wants to format this can
> parse it as they please, ditto for mtime.
>
> Looking at your tests it seemed you went down the route of aligning the
> output with the --debug output, which is already pre-formatted. I.e. to
> make what you have here match:
>
>                 printf("  ctime: %u:%u\n", sd->sd_ctime.sec, sd->sd_ctime.nsec);
>                 printf("  mtime: %u:%u\n", sd->sd_mtime.sec, sd->sd_mtime.nsec);
>                 printf("  dev: %u\tino: %u\n", sd->sd_dev, sd->sd_ino);
>                 printf("  uid: %u\tgid: %u\n", sd->sd_uid, sd->sd_gid);
>                 printf("  size: %u\tflags: %x\n", sd->sd_size, ce->ce_flags);
>
> I think that's a mistake, we should be able to emit those individual
> %-specifiers instead, not that line as-is without the " " prefix and
> "\n" suffix.
>

Yeah, agree. But now I just want to delete all atoms from %(ctime) to %(flags),
and let --debug can work with --format.

> > +
> > +     if (format && (show_stage || show_others || show_killed ||
> > +             show_resolve_undo || skipping_duplicates || debug_mode))
> > +                     die(_("ls-files --format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --debug"));
>
> Use usage_msg_opt() or usage_msg_optf() here instead of die(), and no
> need to include "ls-files " in the message.
>
> See die_for_incompatible_opt4, maybe you can just use that instead? A
> bit painful, but:
>
>     die_for_incompatible_opt4(format, "--format", show_stage, "-s", show_others, "-o", show_killed, "-k");
>     die_for_incompatible_opt4(format, "--format", show_resolve_undo, "--resolve-undo", skipping_duplicates, "--deduplicate", debug_mode, "--debug");
>

Good suggestion. I am curious about why there is no function like
die_for_incompatible_opt4() with variable parameters?

> But urgh, that helper really should use usage_msg_opt() instead, but
> using it for now as-is probably sucks less.
>
> I also think we should not forbid combining this wtih --debug, it's
> helpful to construct a format. This seems to work:
>
>         diff --git a/builtin/ls-files.c b/builtin/ls-files.c
>         index 387641b32df..82f13edef7e 100644
>         --- a/builtin/ls-files.c
>         +++ b/builtin/ls-files.c
>         @@ -343,12 +343,17 @@ static void show_ce(struct repository *repo, struct dir_struct *dir,
>                                           S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode))) {
>                         if (format) {
>                                 show_ce_fmt(repo, ce, format, fullname);
>         -                       return;
>         +                       if (!debug_mode)
>         +                               return;
>                         }
>
>                         tag = get_tag(ce, tag);
>
>         -               if (!show_stage) {
>         +               if (format) {
>         +                       if (!debug_mode)
>         +                               BUG("unreachable");
>         +                       ; /* for --debug */
>         +               } else if (!show_stage) {
>                                 fputs(tag, stdout);
>                         } else {
>                                 printf("%s%06o %s %d\t",
>         @@ -814,7 +819,7 @@ int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cmd_prefix)
>                 }
>
>                 if (format && (show_stage || show_others || show_killed ||
>         -               show_resolve_undo || skipping_duplicates || debug_mode))
>         +               show_resolve_undo || skipping_duplicates))
>                                 die(_("ls-files --format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --debug"));
>
>                 if (show_tag || show_valid_bit || show_fsmonitor_bit) {
>
> I.e. we'll get:
>
>         $ ./git ls-files --debug --format='<%(flags) %(path)>'  -- po/is.po
>         <flags: 0 po/is.po>
>         po/is.po
>           ctime: 1654300098:369653868
>           mtime: 1654300098:369653868
>           dev: 2306     ino: 10487322
>           uid: 1001     gid: 1001
>           size: 3370    flags: 0
>
> Which I think is quite useful when poking around in this an coming up
> with a format.
>

Maybe something like this will be easier?


@@ -343,6 +335,7 @@ static void show_ce(struct repository *repo,
struct dir_struct *dir,
                                  S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode))) {
                if (format) {
                        show_ce_fmt(repo, ce, format, fullname);
+                       print_debug(ce);
                        return;
                }


> > +
> >       if (show_tag || show_valid_bit || show_fsmonitor_bit) {
> >               tag_cached = "H ";
> >               tag_unmerged = "M ";
> > diff --git a/t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh b/t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 00000000000..8c3ef2df138
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh
> > @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
> > +#!/bin/sh
> > +
> > +test_description='git ls-files --format test'
> > +
>
> Add this line here:
>
> TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true
>
> I.e. just before test-lib.sh, see other test examples. Then we'll test
> this under SANITIZE=leak in CI, to ensure it doesn't leak memory.
>
> > +. ./test-lib.sh
> > +
> > +test_expect_success 'setup' '
> > +     echo o1 >o1 &&
> > +     echo o2 >o2 &&
> > +     git add o1 o2 &&
> > +     git add --chmod +x o1 &&
> > +     git commit -m base
> > +'
> > +
> > [...]
>
> > +for flag in -s -o -k --resolve-undo --deduplicate --debug
> > +do
> > +     test_expect_success "git ls-files --format is incompatible with $flag" '
> > +             test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" $flag
> > +     '
> > +done
>
> Nit: I think it's good to move these sotrs of tests before "setup", and
> give them a "usage: " prefix, see some other existing examples.
>

Agree.

> We usually use test_expect_code 129 for those, depending on if you'll
> end up with die() or not...
>
> nit: missing \n before this line:
>
> > +test_done
> >
> > base-commit: ab336e8f1c8009c8b1aab8deb592148e69217085
>

ZheNing Hu

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-26 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-15 13:45 [PATCH 0/2] ls-files: introduce "--format" and "--object-only" options ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2022-06-15 13:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] ls-files: introduce "--format" option ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2022-06-15 20:07   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-06-18 10:50     ` ZheNing Hu
2022-06-15 13:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] ls-files: introduce "--object-only" option ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2022-06-15 20:15   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-06-18 10:59     ` ZheNing Hu
2022-06-19  9:13 ` [PATCH v2] ls-files: introduce "--format" option ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2022-06-19 13:50   ` Phillip Wood
2022-06-20 13:32     ` ZheNing Hu
2022-06-21  2:05   ` [PATCH v3] " ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2022-06-23 14:06     ` Phillip Wood
2022-06-23 15:57       ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-24 10:16         ` Phillip Wood
2022-06-26 13:05           ` ZheNing Hu
2022-06-24 13:20         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-06-24 15:28           ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-26 13:01       ` ZheNing Hu
2022-06-24 13:25     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-06-24 15:33       ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-26 13:35         ` ZheNing Hu
2022-06-27  8:22           ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-27 11:06             ` ZheNing Hu
2022-06-27 15:41               ` Junio C Hamano
2022-07-01 13:30                 ` ZheNing Hu
2022-06-26 13:34       ` ZheNing Hu [this message]
2022-06-26 15:29     ` [PATCH v4] " ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2022-06-27  8:32       ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-27 11:18         ` ZheNing Hu
2022-06-27 18:34       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-07-01 12:42         ` ZheNing Hu
2022-06-28 15:19       ` Phillip Wood
2022-07-01 12:47         ` ZheNing Hu
2022-07-05  6:32       ` [PATCH v5] " ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2022-07-05  8:39         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-07-11 15:14           ` ZheNing Hu
2022-07-05 19:28         ` Torsten Bögershausen
2022-07-11 15:27           ` ZheNing Hu
2022-07-11 16:53         ` [PATCH v6] " ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2022-07-11 22:11           ` Junio C Hamano
2022-07-12 13:53             ` ZheNing Hu
2022-07-12 14:34               ` Junio C Hamano
2022-07-13  6:07           ` [PATCH v7] " ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2022-07-18  8:09             ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-07-19 16:19               ` ZheNing Hu
2022-07-19 16:47                 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-07-19 17:21                   ` ZheNing Hu
2022-07-20 16:36             ` [PATCH v8] " ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2022-07-20 17:37               ` Junio C Hamano
2022-07-21 15:54                 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-07-21 17:22                   ` Eric Sunshine
2022-07-21 17:23                   ` Junio C Hamano
2022-07-22  6:44                 ` ZheNing Hu
2022-07-23 18:40                   ` Junio C Hamano
2022-07-23 18:46                     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-07-24 11:08                     ` ZheNing Hu
2022-07-25  1:03                       ` Junio C Hamano
2022-07-25 11:00                         ` ZheNing Hu
2022-07-23  6:44               ` [PATCH v9] " ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2022-09-08  2:01                 ` Jiang Xin
2022-09-11 11:01                   ` ZheNing Hu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOLTT8RPrtgcsrrdPwNTcD2WUozThaN_QRYu+JOO2er0F8a8-w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=adlternative@gmail.com \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).