From: Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@gmail.com>
To: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Cc: git <git@vger.kernel.org>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rebase: use reflog to find common base with upstream
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 22:40:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANiSa6gNJiUGb47Sw38V3oeJ-=0c1oZ0wO-GhNQminN3+SvgaA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d8e9f102609ee4502f579cb4ce872e0a40756204.1381949622.git.john@keeping.me.uk>
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:53 AM, John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> wrote:
> Commit 15a147e (rebase: use @{upstream} if no upstream specified,
> 2011-02-09) says:
>
> Make it default to 'git rebase @{upstream}'. That is also what
> 'git pull [--rebase]' defaults to, so it only makes sense that
> 'git rebase' defaults to the same thing.
>
> but that isn't actually the case. Since commit d44e712 (pull: support
> rebased upstream + fetch + pull --rebase, 2009-07-19), pull has actually
> chosen the most recent reflog entry which is an ancestor of the current
> branch if it can find one.
>
> Change rebase so that it uses the same logic.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
> ---
> git-rebase.sh | 8 ++++++++
> t/t3400-rebase.sh | 6 ++++--
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/git-rebase.sh b/git-rebase.sh
> index 226752f..fd36cf7 100755
> --- a/git-rebase.sh
> +++ b/git-rebase.sh
> @@ -437,6 +437,14 @@ then
> error_on_missing_default_upstream "rebase" "rebase" \
> "against" "git rebase <branch>"
> fi
> + for reflog in $(git rev-list -g "$upstream_name" 2>/dev/null)
> + do
> + if test "$reflog" = "$(git merge-base "$reflog" HEAD)"
> + then
> + upstream_name=$reflog
> + break
> + fi
> + done
> ;;
> *) upstream_name="$1"
> shift
A little later, "onto_name" gets assigned like so:
onto_name=${onto-"$upstream_name"}
So if upstream_name was set above, then onto would get the same value,
which is not what we want, right? It seems like this block of code
should come a bit later.
I also think it not be run only when rebase was run without a given
upstream. If the configured upstream is "origin/master", it seems like
it would be surprising to get different behavior from "git rebase" and
"git rebase origin/master".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-22 5:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-16 18:53 [PATCH] rebase: use reflog to find common base with upstream John Keeping
2013-10-16 19:24 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-10-16 19:44 ` John Keeping
2013-10-21 5:03 ` Martin von Zweigbergk
2013-10-21 11:24 ` John Keeping
2013-10-22 6:24 ` Martin von Zweigbergk
2013-10-24 19:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-24 19:11 ` [PATCH 0/2] finding the fork point from reflog entries Junio C Hamano
2013-10-24 19:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] merge-base: use OPT_CMDMODE and clarify the command line parsing Junio C Hamano
2013-10-24 19:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] merge-base: "--reflog" mode finds fork point from reflog entries Junio C Hamano
2013-10-24 21:01 ` Eric Sunshine
2013-10-24 21:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-24 21:43 ` Eric Sunshine
2013-10-24 22:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-24 22:21 ` [PATCH v2 " Junio C Hamano
2013-10-25 7:12 ` Johannes Sixt
2013-10-25 8:09 ` John Keeping
2013-10-25 8:17 ` Johannes Sixt
2013-10-25 16:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-25 21:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] merge-base: teach "--fork-point" mode Junio C Hamano
2013-10-25 21:56 ` Eric Sunshine
2013-10-26 5:15 ` Martin von Zweigbergk
2013-10-28 14:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-26 9:00 ` John Keeping
2013-10-28 19:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-29 8:51 ` John Keeping
2013-10-29 20:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-24 20:54 ` [PATCH 0/2] finding the fork point from reflog entries John Keeping
2013-10-24 21:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-24 21:31 ` John Keeping
2013-10-24 21:40 ` John Keeping
2013-10-24 21:50 ` John Keeping
2013-10-25 2:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-22 5:40 ` Martin von Zweigbergk [this message]
2013-10-24 20:26 ` [PATCH] rebase: use reflog to find common base with upstream John Keeping
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANiSa6gNJiUGb47Sw38V3oeJ-=0c1oZ0wO-GhNQminN3+SvgaA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=martinvonz@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=john@keeping.me.uk \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).