From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F551F5AE for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 10:17:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727884AbgFRKR2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2020 06:17:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44440 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727815AbgFRKRS (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2020 06:17:18 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com (mail-qk1-x735.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D50E2C06174E for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 03:17:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id l17so4930660qki.9 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 03:17:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9ARUHRDMUxsP/StW/U8aJ+aPUeVU5PkScFmz4NDD+Yo=; b=GkpZ5U02TPBayIq2sHrat1Gh3t5ZrKt12qp7IvqgmZ3OGTh6d5KZLulunOfoNaHBa7 rLOGsNdX15884XNNdmsJGe0ZO1IqVSIcchW5IVI4ZZ0oQ7HSJKjGjvvo14hfgh29jAem 7/6M9r2mykoppc+cGVjteY/io3CwKV9Dul0itWffDW06uBuRNurt/da+w+xlpgAhWFYo 10usE+K2odyDXHVSyhGFyKlT9b91cC/uINvXpann9UdIcqFnw0rrIdA1/VyDKPxhRNb9 45Jps9w4lOGbuYRipY0P0lgWzmDRQsWOpwpY947/2n1ogpq7aX1+FrXg5Nnj/M3ThX+i +zqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9ARUHRDMUxsP/StW/U8aJ+aPUeVU5PkScFmz4NDD+Yo=; b=EaWbUq6aMgDhxYySw9CkHFy4V+rHq4eeVwrRROar8bJGmTSQ3hsHm+YUB0VKQnh9Ua T/LWS4OhQTWCHIUsTYWQEPWakah9wetMZRrPmGSFboabiVJkNv2BfOQKqvxmqAg6WAVz 7/2Dk2K62dX2+8rTPtel1xTRDO8DNWM9y/o1XIAWy1JnFs+6Hr0qzPRj6nKpCKc7Mehu MKWakKBzqPPr1grl2B14c39hVW5quXNTF0xTn3OrBHwL3Gr+6Lh5dyqL7y/Fx3E6RWbF /SI0EZ33KibN/yA4rFefie4fzlME74fa+j7uP/MGepmSQawCA77iWf1ZNvJyaeFTJZtw jlNw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Gmi315K1XBAg6TztGOOSfDgFc3oAHfiN/XEqbj7TDN0z3Xluh MrDz9VmhbIyuFP8//0mM6n+vGxH2RwZ2CO8ef/A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxq+TKGkTyn33ITQZT6r5tYWmFlWaKHgzE/rBQWnhwstXww2cqWuUfIJc4HoAGVMzsZW3jCNg3rtu6wCTm80KI= X-Received: by 2002:a37:e107:: with SMTP id c7mr2798325qkm.483.1592475435540; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 03:17:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200614181906.u42tuny3eipvhd46@chatter.i7.local> <20200616074316.GA21462@kitsune.suse.cz> <20200617201037.GA86579@google.com> <20200617201709.GB86579@google.com> <20200618083825.GB20837@legohost> In-Reply-To: <20200618083825.GB20837@legohost> From: demerphq Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:17:04 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Rename offensive terminology (master) To: Oleg Cc: Git Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 11:57, Oleg wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 09:57:42AM +0200, demerphq wrote: > > Ultimately if I was the decision maker here I would be choosing terms > > that are as workflow agnostic as I can find. "main", "master" and > > "primary" are not workflow agnostic, they are if anything a bit > > workflow opinionated. "trunk" on the other hand seems pretty > > self-descriptive and doesn't have much baggage. It's bark is worse > > than its byte however. :-) > > The most workflow agnostic name is "branch". it is so neutral that you want to > change it ASAP :-). I suppose I should have said "least confusing/ambiguous while most workflow agnostic". :-) Yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"