From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4233C1F59D for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 09:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=LFaLcVsw; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234626AbjAIJLI (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2023 04:11:08 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46144 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237080AbjAIJJd (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2023 04:09:33 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x834.google.com (mail-qt1-x834.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::834]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B76B61C93F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 01:04:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt1-x834.google.com with SMTP id c7so7273105qtw.8 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 01:04:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uyTIhOmsor0dBIWc29ws4f9HTiqwXbtcOHmoLvHFFtI=; b=LFaLcVsw0aWVQ/mWGgLZzytXthi0gS+cGWR9F6DZv11gZV2vioaREBUrUPdQclwJlt myzcGTLFJZBEdFGXfdbZ0Y1zoVNED32Ki6N8i+ReNEQTTKKVr2r42x2AMpna0jDvmCqy rFGEjt4OCtZPuMC1dxQQ7OBEBObfzRRdDP/imus1U9uxsfG5rRlPmhyhYhLZmGCZ//Y2 OUWX9Fr9m/cEoC31ohgfo5aPaC7y20L83/h0qb3quZNzZfnUL0sM/mq9LNakZLYeJNwU v7W0vK5dcpZ5RVEHmq4sQC70+v7UwKN22M7J+XrZ+X10viXRbdQZ7uuqdhi8ap1nWDCf rAEQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=uyTIhOmsor0dBIWc29ws4f9HTiqwXbtcOHmoLvHFFtI=; b=wd/YeT6FqB9tLXcrpuGnkEURh+cENUBH6JGqul5aH39T87EeuI5w5skJPP+R+cp1YN PKx8FQwHLUeRvYjeOXfWZU/xwEITUaJM9samWxvu/CBDixPPm0kjXh5yrEBWFMtwekIU qDpxCWIMYNPSvnHm9JKCSzjSWbRQzVeBPRhvy4mDrd2peltrYsmRyhYPd9xDVn/w7n9M 9dEZlIgKYw0HZIyj+PbTHm8wpNkbhL1y94JvOicBMEhkekrkf2/H7mzTVXvm8rBUMpa4 ecBe9Z5UH+AXJ6oFaCZOdCM+4g/4E/9+EPlFKnMPyeEjyNRH5DUVvSkoEDSUughpW84V Fi6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2koFldOrCZga4kXaW+SOB+cb1Vhcwp5KNbs3xOCZjhtQjrag8D19 LLOVF5Av4usVnjeu/M3vPlc1XcDgqr+TKt6KDK1VOujMRRo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsLGh254ONSROrH/jNLwCPwxdcQvbEqs+UUttN940oy8Z9ueggUtn6xf6nSxHyHGpv91GAAoe2bAKxyDwyZgzI= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7745:0:b0:3a7:e4d1:c76e with SMTP id g5-20020ac87745000000b003a7e4d1c76emr2236086qtu.505.1673255064639; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 01:04:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: demerphq Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:04:13 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: should git rev-parse -q --verify on a range produce output? To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Git Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 at 04:51, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > demerphq writes: > > > Is this something you think should be fixed? I would give it a go if > > there was some direction on what it should do in this case. Just error > > early and produce no output? > > I do not mind if the error case gets changed to behave differently, > as long as the updated behaviour is something everybody thinks an > improvement over the current behaviour. I do not offhand know what > the "fixed" behaviour should be. > > I do not mind if nothing changed and documentation gets updated to > reduce end-user confusion, either. Ok, I'll wait a bit to see if someone can suggest a good alternative behavior, and if nobody does ill write a doc patch. Cheers! Yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"