From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF0361FD99 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 23:47:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754662AbcHZXrk (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:47:40 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:34945 "EHLO mail-wm0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753133AbcHZXrj (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:47:39 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id f65so10873453wmi.0 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:47:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PurgpFx05rfGLpICGFn80hRqlvetG1emT08mixBBuoo=; b=U4R3BxAg7HAWG1PZiPyF48FQf+KPT+oQb1soCfCJ1lJZrha8SYgWAdxxpTgpGEMDWm hrFWPBo7hbxo/7fccihiMgeDCGUgqDwA1Zk+6aUd8nzHSYNQNm+O361/l0A28gcYncyz 4Fmt/HAUKPjcQbtxi61Evi+qH7yEoWwLNPc02et+pFamYYXdVySxqiTG3Mucun0NqIZ1 b4U3EIpYrMvLbjyRJK8qWRBvPHG0HHkn4r40lL52Vk//LhNEjSUknYPEuKtmfG92mCim oCV0JyHapLpkOSCvzzX7mxCwKB8B1q1gYknbaIHJssfhX0jGb5nVcs55jitZzanWAULi 2qkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PurgpFx05rfGLpICGFn80hRqlvetG1emT08mixBBuoo=; b=mgVZyRM5JibG/0mKfhWNM2lPaeBSS9Ku9RpaExUfu1bsFJu+HcTL6n46WAQik/bTWL kAsUd1FVUukuL1djngIpA/v81drt+fmibsjlFsPXule79RtmZ1ZBvZE/12mf0/9BJdDB Rtq+TdjJ52zqlQK98twGGbWHp6MlOQftvBrMkJ50XtQtPEzavlFkC4lvQ92VoKDmiMUe RF0kCzBCbX+8NOcRrN9wL8mn0esxabMiu36/rF8djul4t+ix6R98JkVH0eP8PyeavFX8 6bOFqNgIukkKMLTRAA2rebiCTMhMsOPHwzrCWv/YC2Q2bcM7ZlkxrUyEwI2pSTmKhOSX GPxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNQTKZ/DUBcnXxwclu7KFedj+9ICn+5AqGgm8k12x2tpeOQ1ATHFezWJoKi61AgPv7b8l49Jb4ke7/rig== X-Received: by 10.28.51.210 with SMTP id z201mr1040965wmz.98.1472255257455; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:47:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.102.70 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:46:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <91a2ffbe-a73b-fbb9-96da-9aea4d439e5a@gmail.com> <20160826061500.GA22213@dcvr> <6d171c23-65f6-5f67-7d80-051f2dfe8678@gmail.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jakub_Nar=C4=99bski?= Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 01:46:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposed questions for "Git User's Survey 2016" To: David Bainbridge Cc: Eric Wong , git , Doug Rathbone , Stefan Beller , Patrick Renaud Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org [for some reason this email is not yet present on GMane NNTP interface] On 26 August 2016 at 21:12, David Bainbridge w= rote: > Hi Jakub, > > This is excellent news! > > As when you last performed the survey it would be useful for us to be abl= e > to see what the users in our organization (Ericsson) think of Git, and th= ere > are many more than when the survey was last performed. > > Do any other organizations of any type have this need? Yes, I will offer separate channels (that can be separately analyzed, and that you can get anonymous data for specific channel) for every organization and/or company that want's it (within reason)... this time with names anonymized from start (unless requested not to). > As for the questions, it might be useful to have a question related to re= po > management systems being used. > Gerrit > Kallithea > Rhodecode > Atlassian Bitbucket > GitHub Enterprise > GitHub.com > GitLab > Deveo > etc. > > This is not directly about Git of course but seeing the extent to which > these are used, and the proportion of users using them might be useful. This is somewhat present in current version of survey, namely there is question about *types* of tools (with git repository management, git hosting tools and code review tools included), and there is free-form question asking to enumerate tools one uses. That is, as above, but more generic, and not multiple choice. I will think about adding such question. Regards --=20 Jakub Nar=C4=99bski