From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B131F934 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 23:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727850AbgLWX4x (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2020 18:56:53 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37028 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727029AbgLWX4x (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2020 18:56:53 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-x335.google.com (mail-ot1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::335]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54FE1C061794 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 15:56:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot1-x335.google.com with SMTP id n42so524670ota.12 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 15:56:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0etxNN3HorBPdkdjRbKVnFrDqzTQ81SckVkHLNBN0zU=; b=m0Tw7Ud00GLzfzgPK8KNH3t+hhST0EFSJFmFw5tOJQehRbtBIW7zudNrp8I7SctTWw 7HV6DAdSpwpueD4fU+xu7N1bAbxk3yvZcsQtyHYK67hHRgA3Phx0dosb3ksaDvBSIvcU /dxTOws6Vl2MenRgeBoBAdCzWNSoo6/i1CNw4O6s9bJQVa68pDplPplFzWMbuqhl5lwI GyXjlA3MprT+o5Ntr4c3epEZ5uiBeJ3wThn6U3Fa0TboZefcL+p+B4tq+BfZvGdeGks9 d8vbzl3ImJwLQU9KfVoW4TklE+BqXCnqHai4dztOOxz/zNUMx+LFnI+1bemlZoL8WS+S xZYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0etxNN3HorBPdkdjRbKVnFrDqzTQ81SckVkHLNBN0zU=; b=jEXHUaU6936uSjDkIn6TpqTTHy/R8cdSk62xfYEy3yMdWed0psFyS050DjSQiddZ1v nIS2W5TPDLOxSsA2LjA+3+rHmzlVjkuvAE9xx6zLtTKnGLDk8mk6tMN169b1LoxNfvTQ TPQ1kdLzsfoIiEsisuZS7zzg4l2ZjxwraIJu1kOYycZaEFNR9qrMQMZC0ns7xmLQnVAM s0IhgjcunHvzGjkOhfkV0ReyUwYHYOpFgbCckfAb1hX6TsxYQy+M4zsR8yCry97Yf0Dg ULjURq++I1F8AcZ5o/frYKs02kkADAW++B4w52E65IpJxHku8a10iajLNnBOj2rVQzUf 2Hzg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5334BV16VaDp4uuvfLD4iLDpDRmGIw07xrkKwd4zmty+DBSvUc4n LNudfsz5z8VApC3OxGfNTORT9xYHrY/m3G23Mqs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJymxZ+P2vDAtsZvgT8gmYha389UXtqMaSnztqVj1Q34hd3dsIf4BPsNQZHAHi9ZkebwIwl35uB/tZoef+OVmic= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6642:: with SMTP id q2mr21009646otm.172.1608767771948; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 15:56:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Nipunn Koorapati Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 23:56:01 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget , Git List , Eric Sunshine Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Is this something we want to merge into the 2.29 maint branch? It is a segfault for anyone pushing with matching refspecs on 2.29 At what point does git stop patching bugs in the maint branch? --Nipunn --Nipunn On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 6:49 AM Junio C Hamano wrote: > > "Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget" writes: > > > Update since Patch series V4 > > > > * Squashed in Junio's patch to handle non-master named branches > > * Explicitly use test_unconfig > > > > Appreciate the reviews from Junio and Eric! Happy Holidays! > > > > Nipunn Koorapati (2): > > negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec > > negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec > > Thanks, will replace. Happy holidays to you, too.