From: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] refs: drop "clear packed-refs while locked" assertion
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 16:26:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMy9T_HiK-DkJRrNUCK+9ffcOcEgd9qc_F2taO8--jv9gQrs5A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171208112222.GA6094@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> This patch fixes a regression in v2.14.0. It's actually fixed already in
> v2.15.0 because all of the packed-ref code there was rewritten. So
> there's no point in applying this on "master" or even "maint". But I
> figured it was worth sharing here in case somebody else runs across it,
> and in case we ever do a v2.14.4 release.
I forgot to respond to this. +1
Reviewed-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Michael
> -- >8 --
> In clear_packed_ref_cache(), we assert that we're not
> currently holding the packed-refs lock. But in each of the
> three code paths that can hit this, the assertion is either
> a noop or actively does the wrong thing:
>
> 1. in rollback_packed_refs(), we will have just released
> the lock before calling the function, and so the
> assertion can never trigger.
>
> 2. get_packed_ref_cache() can reach this assertion via
> validate_packed_ref_cache(). But it calls the validate
> function only when it knows that we're not holding the
> lock, so again, the assertion can never trigger.
>
> 3. lock_packed_refs() also calls validate_packed_ref_cache().
> In this case we're _always_ holding the lock, which
> means any time the validate function has to clear the
> cache, we'll trigger this assertion and die.
>
> This doesn't happen often in practice because the
> validate function clears the cache only if we find that
> somebody else has racily rewritten the packed-refs file
> between the time we read it and the time we took the lock.
>
> So most of the time we don't reach the assertion at all
> (nobody has racily written the file so there's no need
> to clear the cache). And when we do, it is not actually
> indicative of a bug; clearing the cache while holding
> the lock is the right thing to do here.
>
> This final case is relatively new, being triggerd by the
> extra validation added in fed6ebebf1 (lock_packed_refs():
> fix cache validity check, 2017-06-12).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
> ---
> refs/files-backend.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/refs/files-backend.c b/refs/files-backend.c
> index f21a954ce7..dd41e1d382 100644
> --- a/refs/files-backend.c
> +++ b/refs/files-backend.c
> @@ -99,8 +99,6 @@ static void clear_packed_ref_cache(struct files_ref_store *refs)
> if (refs->packed) {
> struct packed_ref_cache *packed_refs = refs->packed;
>
> - if (is_lock_file_locked(&refs->packed_refs_lock))
> - die("BUG: packed-ref cache cleared while locked");
> refs->packed = NULL;
> release_packed_ref_cache(packed_refs);
> }
> --
> 2.15.1.659.g8bd2eae3ea
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-01 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-08 11:22 [PATCH] refs: drop "clear packed-refs while locked" assertion Jeff King
2018-01-01 15:26 ` Michael Haggerty [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMy9T_HiK-DkJRrNUCK+9ffcOcEgd9qc_F2taO8--jv9gQrs5A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).