From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Contreras Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Move sequencer to builtin Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:53:05 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20130608164902.GA3109@elie.Belkin> <20130608173447.GA4381@elie.Belkin> <20130609014049.GA10375@google.com> <20130609052624.GB561@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130609180437.GB810@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130609184553.GG810@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vppvvnetw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v8v2il62c.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Jeff King , Ramkumar Ramachandra , Jonathan Nieder , Duy Nguyen , Git Mailing List , Brandon Casey To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jun 10 18:53:15 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Um5LH-0005kN-2K for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:53:15 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752344Ab3FJQxK (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:53:10 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]:34498 "EHLO mail-la0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751260Ab3FJQxJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:53:09 -0400 Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id dy20so3706277lab.37 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:53:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=QcGERQfpv4i1QfIVMVJQvHyJxW4V88GXSCmjB+qOzNw=; b=pFCYT3DcX40+ugXO2B1jnFm3J1nfks4zNcSAIynmgtwuMeAvA2mk75tl66/5cgrOqx ARfeUYtyTvGiNJ4HLai795ontq2FnxS5FZtI+zCfuYDMtvnG1gxDYymYTpTxeUMbrLHZ 79EH1tOMYp7ZMjrHQo/tUMR5hymV2Vm33C2lUQYjyKmf6V27GY+HgQ0Vh6hdLtp+xPru izJzONEhRWAktqaoce4SqDLfBTp1tSnG+gA9h4sZX5qOQem29ovFMdIjZcC4WR642Jgb 6uMvnN6pd2RQaAMklq1JP0ZDJcpyJpuIRPgDioHxSuPqR57ulwdBrwYUIb3Of4Qhb9mq C1MQ== X-Received: by 10.112.16.163 with SMTP id h3mr6913518lbd.85.1370883185970; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:53:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.59.202 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:53:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7v8v2il62c.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Felipe Contreras writes: > >> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >>> One example of killing the entire thread is when I see "This patch >>> will not be applied" by Felipe in a thread started with his patch. >>> I understand that it is his way to say "this patch is retracted" >>> without having to explicitly say that he now understands that >>> reviews showed why the patch was wrong or that he thanks the >>> reviewer for enlightening him. >> >> You are wrong. There's nothing wrong with the patch. >> ... >> I thought you understood that code should speak, but apparently you don't. > > That is exactly the point Peff raised (and I agreed with), isn't it? > > Bad behaviour (being difficult to work with) has consequences. It is not bad behavior. It is bad behavior *in your opinion*, an opinion that wouldn't be shared by other projects, like the Linux kernel. > E.g. > convincing people that it is not worth their time interacting with > you, especially when there are better things to do like tending to > other topics, and you lose the chance to show that your patches are > good when they indeed are (I don't even know if these patches in > question are good, and I am not going to find out). You are hurting the Git project by doing that, and our users, specially our Windows users. I thought you were a good maintainer. But apparently you would rather listen to the people that only complain, rather than actual code, that actually improves things. -- Felipe Contreras