From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Contreras Subject: Re: [PATCH] send-email: add proper default sender Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 03:14:30 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20121113032727.GA8387@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20121113040104.GA9361@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20121113074720.GA18746@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20121113164845.GD20361@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20121115000726.GA16910@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20121115015052.GA19131@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Rast , Junio C Hamano , Jonathan Nieder To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Nov 15 03:14:52 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TYoyb-0000GR-4v for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 03:14:45 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423501Ab2KOCOb (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:14:31 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:58643 "EHLO mail-ob0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755412Ab2KOCOb (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:14:31 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id wc20so1204929obb.19 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:14:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=URW3qDax7TY7FoOh4FCrnyYwUVVIZvPOA01fP/7G9BY=; b=k3jZz6prxx8xhBKjIGuUJS/V8h7bcSPfIwVoTYYi1gyH/5YS94eyEFksxqaQR2QoIm NzQVsp0oLxVHzXg6pOaw9q9ZA94BujGQAyKr31nnjL1W52rZjwIjG+1tVYvGXDK7/fLs 6TE3MvIr8tKmDdpHsQtd5YxeRKK/XwxolI0tF+IIETWolJuCnYpOD02BI2Pcq8JGF1ij Dytt4+m/L3CyIHKg8kN0svpHlORnT46iHzpllxSi2LDTeZXlw7ERG6VqjmGYMvFzhZY4 oCsLxqEP/CjjJlE2eWG/xJ5E1ftDb6Tg1NUsStPKrCDF4oIdEwSYZXaP/BiKtZmzIs3V SNlA== Received: by 10.60.26.234 with SMTP id o10mr21569647oeg.85.1352945670575; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:14:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.4.74 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:14:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121115015052.GA19131@sigill.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Jeff King wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 02:41:50AM +0100, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> But that I meant that when I introduce a regression it's like I'm >> killing all that is good and sacred about git, and when you do it's >> everything but that. > > The rhetoric in this statement is a good indication that there is > nothing productive to come from our discussing it anymore. The point is still true. >> > If you want to seriously propose changing the behavior of "git commit", >> > I think the best thing would be to make a real patch, laying out the >> > pros and cons in the commit message, and post it. I would not be >> > surprised if the other list participants have stopped reading our thread >> > at this point, and the idea is going otherwise unnoticed. >> >> I would, if I saw any chance in it actually going through. > > Well, it certainly will not go through if you do not try. At least I wouldn't be wasting my time. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras