From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926351F4B4 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729736AbgLJAlo (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2020 19:41:44 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46378 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730230AbgLJAlh (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2020 19:41:37 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x441.google.com (mail-wr1-x441.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::441]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16FBCC0613CF for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 16:40:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x441.google.com with SMTP id l9so3662100wrt.13 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 16:40:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zOhtjyGDeLQPGtXtkJYU2uLd3WpHp8U38q0JKbkH1xM=; b=Na6PPCcemgY5+tb3WoZYU8qeamy1eb54fLl8BhsjGvuHWUgp0sfonTSCWZ19cmPGzN HfmSCLGW1RNafZvV/wXPNCSxkl96lXyp1BQaeO0W5+mCulV0E592pKojC55IZ5GSbQoB pnF+QIgK6DeMG/6uuX47Bc3M9j/djO9lLDS2y8ZwRuhNh3Y0/EQed1LwjexmQMXH4+kV +lQmEVPs1dNjxHLXxZ+4bvNSfQbOIzsLs6V4D9tahZUH3l5astkW0JA8IcQaGE6NzAAg eM7SZkNd8WkJSQXozT4kgfkJZb6oIhN0dfdcKBIgsjxM1bOZSNkuoVZF18MrvrcId4Sq MYyA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zOhtjyGDeLQPGtXtkJYU2uLd3WpHp8U38q0JKbkH1xM=; b=tBAlDIFmDjgVkvIsfU3EOjJ0El+y/2HV2T5u7SOx4BsA8SS9VOH4iSFMHmUv9NjqyM NfyY2c7iWWB7UAzVn9hHI/bY5w3VHYdpHGokoqbgWFhTlTghsD7qQxbP5KHwfuHuImP8 0evKhU4YhH+yPkEutix/H6VfKOMoj858NpMOWiywXXAX0xIju0BMtiqEYWOgEOndWn7m rubH98hMhW2B9uZDmTxN2KkLcw3YzUfoTAQfNArz1O6TO490/z+cc5ISEw+736d6FV47 s0nb0+QOtjhI7rs+kWOYVdGaRCtXD2vOe63wUS3n1uH5eq7/ct4xz0muQCv3iCaYLMcZ IZWw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5319tKj5Th71mu4FIyIwg/KuGlh9o87lxMF6IjcaGGysurQHv4iz 9MarzdHVW7iCjT6ycrJ9jR/Ks5iGJKB73acehts= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyoKiYUjbDcRksY3CvVh0eYPsYBHeDJEcghJxrt+o5y8XKvy3OwBLCDTvGHi30pvGQgyMBGc5M5U6IDgeZR2yA= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4349:: with SMTP id u9mr5136533wrr.319.1607560855916; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 16:40:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Felipe Contreras Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 18:40:45 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] init: provide useful advice about init.defaultBranch To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Junio C Hamano , Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , Git Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 5:24 PM Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote: > The distribution already can add patches, so this objection is a red > herring. The sysadm can pick a different value for `init.defaultBranch` > and dictate to the user silently what initial branch name to use, so that > is also a red herring. Yes, but if they do; they have picked the ball. The user would blame them--and not Git--for any unexpected change in behavior. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras