From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2451E1F576 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2018 08:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753236AbeCFIea (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Mar 2018 03:34:30 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com ([209.85.223.176]:47101 "EHLO mail-io0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753075AbeCFIe3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Mar 2018 03:34:29 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-f176.google.com with SMTP id p78so21151415iod.13 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:34:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UraLVB0dKSiHfhCVLfkPY3Yyy0ntuSFRHnZ4/EklUeI=; b=MXHDHG4qKiPZCjJMxF6Tquu7sPETPDhrIXYZz5Pa/kN2teWWcmgOLGWwI/VQ/TnhF9 VYsc2UMOmhnL328GBpup8wKQs3sWISAazGSo806zYlwCsfUlexjD2qIaSSj+cwy7Q9wE edhReZ/RS0MoKPkzMAePZay4+pqJiea984wmoESvkevAJKiZYPTAoPdtTMax1H3xnc4N kfOtyjIIXkrHU1NkIYXbEbXHeQH7c/uhGE9bsXK+tVo3tDyS+msWEAMMUiop/cVZ/5Oi OlYFgN6BeFt3+O4HRbms2erZEwd2//zma/XH1VUgyvocU2/VAY7KSBC94wh22QFR6fVL eXAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UraLVB0dKSiHfhCVLfkPY3Yyy0ntuSFRHnZ4/EklUeI=; b=RM7s6fbOUf+0bHCw2TC8DzZNDwfcpwisnSGA7N4RB/iJVwmWPt00Z/BeO00o8EZwCz bsXVlMMuaWTuCMN1unwlcCNaSOIm9SGbem6hiV2wgTiPKbHL+V2qElKtjDtoxmh9tFPu +VCoMmhbSvhghMkIFE1j7pZO/AD/HYF/2D1znKoA69wK74McWTksbzyhA5Rjnm84qA35 jC+7g1RNhk1xXm7McNt55MXhBfcK7CTBXd0km2jvCL/LMhiQc+h87uJkkifMdiP5GSB4 fMT4ix3chrbMtzqAG1zq5ctsQ5p5Gc/INPKPcd6sd5qmGFXLOrws6m71hNaBct0Jp89R chbg== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7E++cfRvxv+jxtCCaUa/f9A+NSaQPcrqWJH8EJs5fU5DT+vnxOR kLagPyrxsjOm87xhQwfh4hX+GnGueBRj86OgJE6YUg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELs1yg+sZXwzJcFsgWAo1kCEuUhWS2iaUJSk5vTFlkBVPI55nSo1QfRNZmEp3uOfnB3De2RRN8YDZynlg0aiuxc= X-Received: by 10.107.97.21 with SMTP id v21mr20082117iob.22.1520325269358; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:34:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.63.6 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Mar 2018 00:34:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20180305200400.3769-1-sidm1999@gmail.com> From: Siddhartha Mishra Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 14:04:28 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GSoC] [PATCH] travis-ci: added clang static analysis To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > SiddharthaMishra writes: > >> Added a job to run clang static code analysis on the master and maint branch >> >> Signed-off-by: SiddharthaMishra >> --- > > Why on 'master' and 'maint' and not others? Quite frankly, I find > this choice of branches rather odd, as these two branches are not > where the real development happens. If we do not want to increase > the number of jobs and limit the test only to a single branch, I > would probably pick 'next', and if we can afford two, probably > 'pu' and 'next'. I might have been misinterpreting it, but I did so because that's what it said in the microproject description. Thinking about it, I guess it does makes more sense to work on the other two branches instead. Are there any other glaring issues you see in the code?