git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Siddhartha Mishra <sidm1999@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GSoC] [PATCH] travis-ci: added clang static analysis
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 14:04:28 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMOtk6BafDOX6PkOs=KVPp5rf1wF3Zq9ZWMAiKgw+EN2KTsndg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqpo4i6lj0.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> SiddharthaMishra <sidm1999@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Added a job to run clang static code analysis on the master and maint branch
>>
>> Signed-off-by: SiddharthaMishra <sidm1999@gmail.com>
>> ---
>
> Why on 'master' and 'maint' and not others?  Quite frankly, I find
> this choice of branches rather odd, as these two branches are not
> where the real development happens.  If we do not want to increase
> the number of jobs and limit the test only to a single branch, I
> would probably pick 'next', and if we can afford two, probably
> 'pu' and 'next'.

I might have been misinterpreting it, but I did so because that's what
it said in the microproject description. Thinking about it, I guess it
does makes more sense to work on the other two branches instead. Are
there any other glaring issues you see in the code?

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-06  8:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-05 20:04 [GSoC] [PATCH] travis-ci: added clang static analysis SiddharthaMishra
2018-03-06  1:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-06  8:34   ` Siddhartha Mishra [this message]
2018-03-07 13:16     ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-03-12 10:19 ` Lars Schneider
2018-03-13 17:45   ` Siddhartha Mishra
2018-03-13 17:52     ` Siddhartha Mishra
2018-04-01 14:39     ` Lars Schneider
2018-04-02 20:08       ` Siddhartha Mishra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMOtk6BafDOX6PkOs=KVPp5rf1wF3Zq9ZWMAiKgw+EN2KTsndg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=sidm1999@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).