git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>,
	kgybels@infogroep.be, "Git mailing list" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	kilobyte@angband.pl,
	"Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	"Michael J Gruber" <git@grubix.eu>, "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
	tboegi@web.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gc --auto: release pack files before auto packing
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 11:40:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM0VKj=u0OVad3QDRFOc+NWZ9TfwqAwmZ47s=5e5jGZaPQRH6g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqpo00mi7q.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 6:39 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 03:38:21PM +0200, Kim Gybels wrote:
> >> Teach gc --auto to release pack files before auto packing the repository
> >> to prevent failures when removing them.
> >>
> >> Also teach the test 'fetching with auto-gc does not lock up' to complain
> >> when it is no longer triggering an auto packing of the repository.
> >>
> >> Fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/500
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kim Gybels <kgybels@infogroep.be>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Patch based on master, since problem doesn't reproduce on maint,
> >> however, the improvement to the test might be valuable on maint.
> >>
> >>  builtin/gc.c     | 1 +
> >>  t/t5510-fetch.sh | 2 ++
> >>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/builtin/gc.c b/builtin/gc.c
> >> index ccfb1ceaeb..63b62ab57c 100644
> >> --- a/builtin/gc.c
> >> +++ b/builtin/gc.c
> >> @@ -612,6 +612,7 @@ int cmd_gc(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> >>              return -1;
> >>
> >>      if (!repository_format_precious_objects) {
> >> +            close_all_packs(the_repository->objects);
> >
> > We have repo_clear() which does this and potentially closing file
> > descriptors on other things as well. I suggest we use it, and before
> > any external command is run. Something like
> >
> > diff --git a/builtin/gc.c b/builtin/gc.c
> > index ccfb1ceaeb..a852c71da6 100644
> > --- a/builtin/gc.c
> > +++ b/builtin/gc.c
> > @@ -473,6 +473,13 @@ static int report_last_gc_error(void)
> >
> >  static int gc_before_repack(void)
> >  {
> > +     /*
> > +      * Shut down everything, we should have all the info we need
> > +      * at this point. Leaving some file descriptors open may
> > +      * prevent them from being removed on Windows.
> > +      */
> > +     repo_clear(the_repository);
> > +
> >       if (pack_refs && run_command_v_opt(pack_refs_cmd.argv, RUN_GIT_CMD))
> >               return error(FAILED_RUN, pack_refs_cmd.argv[0]);
>
> With
>
>   https://public-inbox.org/git/20180509170409.13666-1-pclouds@gmail.com/
>
> the call to repo_clear() on the_repository itself may be safe [*1*],
> but if command line parsing code etc. has pointers to in-core object
> etc. obtained before this function was called, the codeflow after
> this function returns will be quite disturbed.  Has anybody in this
> review thread audited the codeflow _after_ this function is run to
> make sure that invalidating in-core repository here does not cause
> us problems?

It does create us problems, unfortunately.

Among other things, a call to repo_clear(the_repository) does this:

  raw_object_store_clear(repo->objects);
  FREE_AND_NULL(repo->objects);

Later on cmd_gc() calls reprepare_packed_git(the_repository), which
then attempts to:

  r->objects->approximate_object_count_valid = 0;
  r->objects->packed_git_initialized = 0;

but with r->objects being NULL at this point that won't work, and in
turn causes failures in several test scripts.


FWIW, the original patch appears to be working fine, at least the test
suite passes.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-07  9:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-30 13:38 [PATCH] gc --auto: release pack files before auto packing Kim Gybels
2018-06-30 14:58 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-06 16:39   ` Junio C Hamano
2018-07-07  9:40     ` SZEDER Gábor [this message]
2018-07-07 23:16       ` Kim Gybels
2018-07-09 14:33         ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-09 21:10           ` Junio C Hamano
2018-07-11 15:33             ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-04 20:16 ` [PATCH v2] gc --auto: clear repository " Kim Gybels
2018-07-07  9:57   ` SZEDER Gábor
2018-07-09 20:37   ` [PATCH v3] gc --auto: release pack files " Kim Gybels

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAM0VKj=u0OVad3QDRFOc+NWZ9TfwqAwmZ47s=5e5jGZaPQRH6g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@grubix.eu \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=kgybels@infogroep.be \
    --cc=kilobyte@angband.pl \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=tboegi@web.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).