From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ramkumar Ramachandra Subject: Re: Should "git help" respect the 'pager' setting? Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 22:38:59 +0530 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Michael Campbell , git@vger.kernel.org To: Matthieu Moy X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 30 19:09:45 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ui6MC-000096-Rv for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 30 May 2013 19:09:45 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934534Ab3E3RJl (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 May 2013 13:09:41 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com ([209.85.223.181]:65143 "EHLO mail-ie0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758408Ab3E3RJk (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 May 2013 13:09:40 -0400 Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id x14so1231109ief.12 for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 10:09:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=jid0Ams1kG7gans1BqY3oSSZGzi1+7TpltycgucN2nE=; b=e/SgGyAP/4iCdrkEc7xmSBzl8EdMMAP4Q22u7xHIsjcwghLcBseP2H0V1g4AM8yJKL X6RttEogLP/5xsWqjuZIcIoDWg1PMzerM3YXZmi+sHP0jSJ5vto8iZvDsE3SMHei9n39 y58pdmEQKHd0f5Igb9RbEis5FlE+KPNvXBwww69J8BXhSQ2CazDXBC2Q0RHeuiPomIP7 WMA36k9QoJbo0VOF5tf/egtpgzbVLfk3T5+6McosHwSa3CTcxXnF6vLf7kt//DsaGWZM 8yf3siod3wyv9Vigxc6vMnogLbkHxx/KGi9G/J8UDfOGh6lk8Mkv66AV02OU73cMhlcA EGKw== X-Received: by 10.50.171.161 with SMTP id av1mr4090484igc.104.1369933779771; Thu, 30 May 2013 10:09:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.226.135 with HTTP; Thu, 30 May 2013 10:08:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Matthieu Moy wrote: > I find it a bit weird that Git sets the configuration for external > commands, but it may make sense. No strong opinion here. I don't mean a setenv() kind of thing: how would we unset it after that? Perhaps something like execvpe(), passing in the environment as an argument?