From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ramkumar Ramachandra Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Towards a useable git-branch Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 21:28:00 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1369405177-7855-1-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Git List , Junio C Hamano To: Duy Nguyen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 24 17:59:00 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UfuOP-0001gx-P7 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 17:58:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754996Ab3EXP6l (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2013 11:58:41 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f173.google.com ([209.85.223.173]:55597 "EHLO mail-ie0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754573Ab3EXP6k (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2013 11:58:40 -0400 Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id k5so12789190iea.18 for ; Fri, 24 May 2013 08:58:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=qcHuuDg7uVF2uA2LjjrsEPETZ8kM1DAM/XPynVfD2UA=; b=uaUUiGWIUPedZIsxLpjT/ci5+tWzhltExgmG0pbU/NL+opu7o+nRefdEe6dHz1c6Kr CdBO+6uMDSrLWMrNhPXPPNFukYEPa6wdfRUDz6EVM2NXh7MLcDY8KO5ktm/kwZpBLvYp 9eUwcHZEO0k7QrJpCJ9oHp9TaQoM7B5lF2Fwpdw+9lhTLVwYTI+Hml7vfcj5VmvnVk0v dG/dcWS7QAMDX7pHHMNkVmwHmz52merPN0tPG655ZlyEjVVA0NTeRPxXEuUtEuEj8in1 OycFWVBjcqLtqNmIVmy1yTV8i3gEyf/d6I0cMnQ2eRVvJtIwXAq0Wv7MFJj3hCBb9Tas nrJA== X-Received: by 10.50.33.19 with SMTP id n19mr14162372igi.44.1369411120414; Fri, 24 May 2013 08:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.46.1 with HTTP; Fri, 24 May 2013 08:58:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Duy Nguyen wrote: > Usefulness is one thing. Another is maintenance and in that regard I > still think we should be able to remove -v and -vv code (not the > functionality) with this topic. Why? The topic adds good functionality, doesn't break anything, doesn't paint us into any corner, and has users. Replacing -v and -vv can be done eventually, after we get alignment.