Re: [PATCH 11/14] revert: Introduce a layer of indirection over pick_commits

[Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>]

Hi Junio,

Junio C Hamano writes:
> Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> writes:
>> diff --git a/builtin/revert.c b/builtin/revert.c
>> index 7d76f92..8cdcdb6 100644
>> --- a/builtin/revert.c
>> +++ b/builtin/revert.c
>> @@ -677,10 +677,8 @@ static int cleanup_sequencer_data(void)
>>       return 0;
>>  }
>>
>> -static int pick_commits(struct replay_opts *opts)
>> +static int pick_commits(struct commit_list *todo_list, struct replay_opts *opts)
>>  {
>> -     struct commit_list *todo_list = NULL;
>> -     unsigned char sha1[20];
>>       struct commit_list *cur;
>>       int res;
>>
>> @@ -690,12 +688,6 @@ static int pick_commits(struct replay_opts *opts)
>>                               opts->record_origin || opts->edit));
>>       read_and_refresh_cache(me, opts);
>>
>> -     walk_revs_populate_todo(&todo_list, opts);
>> -     create_seq_dir();
>> -     if (!get_sha1("HEAD", sha1))
>> -             save_head(sha1_to_hex(sha1));
>> -     save_todo(todo_list, opts);
>> -
>>       for (cur = todo_list; cur; cur = cur->next) {
>>               save_todo(cur, opts);
>>               res = do_pick_commit(cur->item, opts);
>> @@ -710,6 +702,22 @@ static int pick_commits(struct replay_opts *opts)
>>       return cleanup_sequencer_data();
>>  }
>>
>> +static int process_continuation(struct replay_opts *opts)
>> +{
>> +     struct commit_list *todo_list = NULL;
>> +     unsigned char sha1[20];
>> +
>> +     read_and_refresh_cache(me, opts);
>> +
>> +     walk_revs_populate_todo(&todo_list, opts);
>> +     create_seq_dir();
>> +     if (!get_sha1("HEAD", sha1))
>> +             persist_head(sha1_to_hex(sha1));
>> +     persist_todo(todo_list, opts);
>
> Don't these two need forward declarations before their use?

Good catch.  I'm surprised the compiler didn't catch these.

-- Ram