From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ramkumar Ramachandra Subject: Re: [PATCH] submodule: use abbreviated sha1 in 'status' output Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:15:42 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1348926195-4788-1-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com> <1348926195-4788-2-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com> <50670655.3030600@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Git List To: Jens Lehmann X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Sep 29 16:46:58 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1THyJk-0002Jp-Je for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:46:56 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754262Ab2I2OqF (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:46:05 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:58129 "EHLO mail-qa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753494Ab2I2OqD (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:46:03 -0400 Received: by mail-qa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id c26so605594qad.19 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 07:46:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=le655zJdS0uf4zO337g+9RyKioVgq4f0dHcvhS5j83I=; b=jxBnyKYRNl0UGBEE4N7TxP93ZlYeE+btchyZPgiOVfRzUM9KLuLDGbYdbQ0XLQwLQ8 YWKspfBIvKLwizhSEyvlFY3lF+CEnT9pqcQfutz7C6NIFP289mPQgW+mCA2p/ztxHKBE osTWDm1yxDWVKvgpWXZuDaDcwT9e/sG6NPX/pIOrfYADg2XSuZOYxHSFJrTIQy0n8KnR +Sa9LQ5CKaqix/w8rL5U5dnp3nFh32wdh8u9cPwKeWdr5wvqNHV6Co+bmw2at3ll75KE 0XGMNWGA1KjxrLsGCl/7KAQLZlUPsS3UpAw4JxwCUkFR/dThYNRgpjb2Hg+m4SHEqIyP SMrw== Received: by 10.229.111.70 with SMTP id r6mr6745075qcp.120.1348929962402; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 07:46:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.84.105 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 07:45:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <50670655.3030600@web.de> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jens Lehmann wrote: > I'm not against the change per se, but do we really want to risk breaking > scripts which parse the output of "git submodule status" without even > providing a commit message explaining why we did that? Oh, I didn't realize that there might be such scripts. What justification do I give in the commit message apart from prettification? Ram