From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ramkumar Ramachandra Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Towards a useable git-branch Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 19:58:49 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1369405177-7855-1-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Git List , Junio C Hamano To: Duy Nguyen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 28 16:29:36 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UhKu6-0003g5-RP for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 16:29:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934299Ab3E1O3b (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2013 10:29:31 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f180.google.com ([209.85.223.180]:38475 "EHLO mail-ie0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934123Ab3E1O3a (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2013 10:29:30 -0400 Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id b11so7330268iee.11 for ; Tue, 28 May 2013 07:29:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=BREh2u0qJLq45tqBRb7S7JTO8RRJqt4aXz+Goy1kdr8=; b=uxy+wH5ET4QcrIT9k60+gF8oTl/DwmS/FrCLaEz7kQAvO0OcpUCsF5OctFeusTUYxr eRswtxatJs5ocTQKLmTZh4lyYhXFSohBiC/tTttz7XEsZwG7izVEMlks1lxjDXtWS9H3 QjDvYdrk0iOVYLN+VMoXHWDGQIwIEfXamwDk9EkeydzxoKHcD/RGT2Ne3zNclmq6aTVk TG/dgJhhlL9YOBC4M0KratBHGPgP3t0gtk2WOI3mfmG1KJ862hhKjP6i3BwQZoGkvEzb 6EHTgdPQG+RkbSmpN7SgmdwoqfDmA0tIqBLbHh4TakuQK7Ye2aQxD38JNPfzd1pQo7tF k7Kg== X-Received: by 10.50.153.6 with SMTP id vc6mr6951000igb.57.1369751369972; Tue, 28 May 2013 07:29:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.226.135 with HTTP; Tue, 28 May 2013 07:28:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > %>(N) doesn't work properly with f-e-r, and I'm not sure why. I'm not > talking about your last patch where you compute * -- that works fine; > it's just that %>(N) doesn't when N is a concrete number. Try this: %(refname:short)%>(30)%(upstream:short) (assuming that you have lots of branches). I'm noticing random alignment problems. However, %<(N) doesn't seem to have this problem: %<(30)%(refname:short)%(upstream:short) I'm not able to figure this out.