From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ramkumar Ramachandra Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] for-each-ref: introduce %C(...) for color Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 11:32:29 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1383212774-5232-1-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com> <1383212774-5232-2-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Git List To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Nov 02 07:03:32 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VcUJ1-0006dV-JQ for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 07:03:31 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751453Ab3KBGDZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Nov 2013 02:03:25 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f171.google.com ([209.85.223.171]:55797 "EHLO mail-ie0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751263Ab3KBGDJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Nov 2013 02:03:09 -0400 Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id tp5so9041929ieb.16 for ; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 23:03:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=t8rYtGH/844LlKre+9Mz1yvmTSJpxFetwmAS3DMuW4c=; b=KGuTKLvWIuJxfGVqeOwy9gCzWpqhy69RsJHkMNlogBBNL1kZu2hPfr/3oefeF3KJ0l jX2COLZRHOYtBhM6tfvedeFRGmHBDP/XgBGEteAeyLU9TFyXHkdnhajHxFqmSvR08iAx pRtWJZUtkB3tKSaXIZZdJ/kTTLNSqnJiCDukMST3zXXnhLYTn83SDYa7oZtv03iNoPkR 4ikcoq/76NPobhET1TSA3yAUeqJHJ0uLOXsxZpu9VZseoySxLmyxHkgHfQFHg4qcUhp6 jsHDMboqgWm0pPeBa6FQU0HLejzD0UCHJV6yzLEFfk6LBUbglwiibkTxPmQM7CGrwt2y 2EFg== X-Received: by 10.50.23.16 with SMTP id i16mr4822037igf.50.1383372189440; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 23:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.73.36 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 23:02:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > This patch is about for-each-ref and your series does not seem to > aim to unify it in any way with pretty-formats, so I would have > expected an enhancement in line with the former, not the latter. While I might never attempt a unification again, there's no harm in getting the formats to resemble each other in part; it's likely that users of f-e-r format will be familiar with pretty-formats.