From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ramkumar Ramachandra Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] Add new git-related helper to contrib Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 17:38:25 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1369884777-7227-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , Duy Nguyen To: Felipe Contreras X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 30 14:09:13 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ui1fN-00079F-0y for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 30 May 2013 14:09:13 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752346Ab3E3MJJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 May 2013 08:09:09 -0400 Received: from mail-bk0-f42.google.com ([209.85.214.42]:38183 "EHLO mail-bk0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751588Ab3E3MJH (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 May 2013 08:09:07 -0400 Received: by mail-bk0-f42.google.com with SMTP id jk14so101433bkc.1 for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 05:09:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=holkGLXTt13KdOwlT8G+9iwUj7ll1V8UZxgtMmX6XWw=; b=qHtE48v6yCve3D1vlx30ue7i+T/Z3fVQpMLL8kh9khbYTbG1TL4d1hL3QewQ7H/Ksa jFCcxuu2npW48210NifzRI38jEH/yHh2xymFxLWyhD7wrrPTsLz1RCC95dfvUHGcRgIw K1W+3hTooo6aCOoephj6/mnia/eqmHc2ZaZ4BHvryhEXdDahjbj5zX7CqQ3unpiBJ4m2 wsTeO0MBTCyELX9Y7vZjqNFqEYMOMUwB4ilWd/ck3T+oebE6NI6AU1qV0exdWI+87LxQ QVE+1yjQJOHlKanj/s7xdNP5xcNErCNDm6p0H/c3QGnvDVI4Y4rfXuqeD2tr+tcj4a8Q YNAQ== X-Received: by 10.205.44.193 with SMTP id uh1mr1766566bkb.14.1369915745854; Thu, 30 May 2013 05:09:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.172.209 with HTTP; Thu, 30 May 2013 05:08:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Felipe Contreras wrote: > What's your objective? Block this patch from ever going in? > > Not a single one of these comments makes a difference at all, all of > them can wait until after the patch is merged, many of them are a > matter of preferences, and some of them have already been addressed as > precisely that: disagreements in style. You posted a patch, and I reviewed it. End of story. I never explicitly or implicitly indicated that I want to block the patch, so stop pulling stuff out of your arse. If you don't want a review, write "DO NOT REVIEW" (or better yet, don't hit my inbox). I'm not interested in wasting my time either.