From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Antoine Pelisse Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2013, #07; Thu, 20) Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:32:45 +0200 Message-ID: References: <7v1u7woydw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vk3lno40x.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vtxkrmlz5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , git To: Ramkumar Ramachandra X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 21 19:32:52 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uq5Cd-0003Pg-0c for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:32:51 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423490Ab3FURcr (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:32:47 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-f170.google.com ([209.85.216.170]:42782 "EHLO mail-qc0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423122Ab3FURcq (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:32:46 -0400 Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id s1so4898003qcw.29 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:32:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9fNk9bcJTA/kG5wjqrZC4QrrBXvTgnA4hH6gupZazxs=; b=K2/Ov1GDJjQz2a8EAT2QCgzr+9v/m2GRZVZ3UoOHBcIFDZ20DCmvmwUxgH47wNhouR Rhod2+RFGsssIsZHc50bzgAKTZNf3QqhSPqQYZTFEUG53X0UltZ/aYUWSlQwSPAPWxzt FH7pJLgWwd7nwFCPoPdBhh/aINtnpFsJLc5hDssn/UKmzIPHDoV5AE+3DK4hdpUrumaZ wHvAAYw4IoqUw7aqHUoEtrR0qlMQZlBxkteZDHsNfJ1+YEiVMDkBxKxU5haYYMfyRKwC D4uEx2cmBh5uH4cwcgbLFT+hT2m6gSlpOYDKGBoqstgCILr2iYbZAzIPYb+LbYrEwmCN 42IQ== X-Received: by 10.224.182.79 with SMTP id cb15mr15211046qab.48.1371835965770; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:32:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.108.105 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:32:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> ... I've noticed a significant decline in >>> list-reviews in general: a lot of good code on the list hasn't been >>> reviewed. >> >> Hmph, I do not particularly see that happening. > > Observer bias. To verify either claim, could you run some stats on > the ML archives [1] and report the results? Do we really need that ? Flaming generates lots of useless discussions that would be difficult to interpret/extract from your numbers. I think we should focus on improving what is left to improve. That is of course merely my humble opinion.