From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johan Herland Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Move sequencer to builtin Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 21:11:44 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20130608164902.GA3109@elie.Belkin> <20130608173447.GA4381@elie.Belkin> <20130609014049.GA10375@google.com> <20130609052624.GB561@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130609174049.GA1039@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130609181002.GC810@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Jeff King , Jonathan Nieder , Duy Nguyen , Git Mailing List , Junio C Hamano , Brandon Casey , Ramkumar Ramachandra To: Felipe Contreras X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jun 09 21:11:55 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ull1u-000397-Az for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 21:11:54 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751524Ab3FITLu (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jun 2013 15:11:50 -0400 Received: from mail12.copyleft.no ([188.94.218.224]:49200 "EHLO mail12.copyleft.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751404Ab3FITLt (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jun 2013 15:11:49 -0400 Received: from locusts.copyleft.no ([188.94.218.116] helo=mail.mailgateway.no) by mail12.copyleft.no with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Ull1o-0003jz-Az for git@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 21:11:48 +0200 Received: from mail-oa0-f50.google.com ([209.85.219.50]) by mail.mailgateway.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1UlkVN-0006Lo-3G for git@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 20:38:17 +0200 Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id l20so5088970oag.37 for ; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 12:11:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=8KLg0C27e8TVLE+5Ci6ooYB7L7PrnwzuGQqj+pCc+vg=; b=gmg7XHfibRkZHYSpme3Nx+KY1VTqCRMPxny1QCkF/E5DPxUFUPEFxzFOA3jTzReopy Sp3DN64l+bzI3UjVwqrH8Xl9JiBuz91J5THUDDlc03TGg428nyFekyp8BjuI15kfnHvy ekIEbd1ltnNMwSn0TJKNYnQx+DKoNbjYnWyNo/4PUExaW4ROIvt+xxAwUmWSxAEU4HmK t/kGnA4Lpub/Et8vSkGRzmfaDHKy5KoYMC2hnjGcs+1eYm5JJNOA6wA6oPQc3AWhxIRN 4bcyW70rGmZkt2p4FSOXw0KtD2g6kfM2ZttleB/xn8HKXnSUZ/SRm8eT3xT3TVIoyau7 u1pg== X-Received: by 10.182.16.137 with SMTP id g9mr3780281obd.17.1370805104708; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 12:11:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.102.5 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Jun 2013 12:11:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Jeff King wrote: >> Go back to my 261 commits, show me one that is "unmindful of technical details". > > And you say this thread is an excellent example of your point that I'm > unmindful of technical details? > > It's not. There are no technical details I was unmindful of in this thread. Ok, I'll bite (against my better judgment). From a related thread, a few minutes ago: On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Thomas Rast wrote: >> So you would deliberately break a bisection on this test file? > No, this patch series won't be applied. Thomas points out a technical detail with the patch series, and the answer given is 100% non-constructive. FWIW, I'd like to express my support for the opinions expressed by Jonathan, Jeff and Thomas. They accurately describe my impression of these discussion threads. ...Johan -- Johan Herland, www.herland.net