From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2410B207EC for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 16:16:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966476AbcIWQQV (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 12:16:21 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:36162 "EHLO mail-wm0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965898AbcIWQQU (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 12:16:20 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id w84so40839743wmg.1 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:16:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vr4j7sxW35U5KK4L3oWPASEV640KD3XlRlFPfZexz0A=; b=e5Jn/VcEecVultwhRJowuOjBF+yH/bnXWKvRrqogFktHmQw7gIDkZKNvaSb3pkIqKq fQ0gh1wEBB40n9YaAa71gPmpAZUxU8ohW0GNqS+kL12gNjSz+r4tpZBy+rh1P38MrspW u3WlTE6vg/E+tmNvJ48vwmA1zhhNslI0cjJbnBBP7c2N58I3mb3NJlPPZAwC96wjIwj4 78IPGmS09kASP3Znhn7rWygxh+EgEFBMqHJgOk4/Tudzsjz91sZIAnDADcHtHDvn0Yc7 E4Fu6JwG1df7CMmTvd/A6rPuo3tXPHKLBB2Z4cj3ICyUgEEaNJeon7d4Wr9N7HCOq268 TRUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vr4j7sxW35U5KK4L3oWPASEV640KD3XlRlFPfZexz0A=; b=VG4qbZoBiA068CPXwzFRUsL/113ydBD6uzd8IM6mMp1Y/4P3f7ycSL6CjebS/kJlVV du6ex7rrLrp+l6fLiwOtVAQx5/5hQGMZGLvFToEgNWorJ870P4tmgra6eIRkACSjMwTc 9ClDf8dKMDsXKJvETJ0riXzuG9pNF/vzoQv0sv3bTjOoV3IJ333jwRlelZvi4xQFlFuK FAWdXqaIp6PaILKPLYZd/sbLRI3f3kj+oieBhI8rnsnJhps73aq39cCAvywcN4WvD8o3 A01/J13z0DmR7Z5aQB3oGx+v3O+JDXKgFKReLsTi1JpAXZaCUKeTao6zFFoQBuDSvqUT NN5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RntXQHiT3Iw0L35K7qp63uSzk1sXU5alTE+a+ZPVO+/KbVkcBaWF3lK438eqH5TCYZwV5443fTuoJEp5JnG X-Received: by 10.194.149.102 with SMTP id tz6mr7494137wjb.154.1474647378575; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:16:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.69.25 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:16:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160923060643.3ubr5gn7qczzs2ut@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1474495472-94190-1-git-send-email-bmwill@google.com> <20160922041854.7754ujcynhk7mdnh@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160923034113.4rnps3nogvzxkfjx@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160923060643.3ubr5gn7qczzs2ut@sigill.intra.peff.net> From: Brandon Williams Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:16:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ls-files: adding support for submodules To: Jeff King Cc: Stefan Beller , Junio C Hamano , "git@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org > Yeah, a positive "I support this" flag would at least let us correctly > flag errors, which is the best we can do. That won't work for > non-builtins, but perhaps it is good enough in practice. > > -Peff So it sounds like we agree that this prefix option should be pushed to the top level. The question is have we come to a consensus on what we should be calling the option? Leave it as submodule-prefix or do we need to come up with a different name? -Brandon