From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bert Wesarg Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] git-gui: fix applying line/ranges when the selection ends at the begin of a line Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 06:26:14 +0100 Message-ID: References: <37339be035746797fcec7634e3560ffcd5b26cf3.1326116492.git.bert.wesarg@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Bert Wesarg To: Pat Thoyts X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 14 06:26:21 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rlw8C-00008n-9L for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 06:26:20 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750843Ab2ANF0Q (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jan 2012 00:26:16 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:60211 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750707Ab2ANF0P (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jan 2012 00:26:15 -0500 Received: by wgbds12 with SMTP id ds12so3764490wgb.1 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:26:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=V0yso1ujwGliy93Mr46gHzFCDtRCyG04SyrLCoz8NvM=; b=Ftgb0YGzhJ5HUL8U06HGl4LwM8spxz8mkbyprrRZIk7XWknw9rKrGZzo3qOC2jzMdE 2C+f1gU9SoVtksQMQUOC9BvyhdbnQtuqJLROY3+pdufbDudD9tDiUKTfIGt2aOwqWsvL K9vm5W942oPX5MMUvCr9OSEk1iyzkQBL7pDs4= Received: by 10.180.75.7 with SMTP id y7mr6643643wiv.2.1326518774840; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:26:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.118.10 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:26:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <37339be035746797fcec7634e3560ffcd5b26cf3.1326116492.git.bert.wesarg@googlemail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi Pat, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 14:43, Bert Wesarg wrote: > Selecting also the trailing newline of a line for staging/unstaging would > have resulted in also staging/unstaging of the next line. > same here, could you please consider pushing this into the 1.7.9 release. I see no point in waiting for the next release. Thanks. Bert