From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AB21F4B4 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 12:59:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725768AbhAWM5y (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jan 2021 07:57:54 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59498 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725535AbhAWM5x (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jan 2021 07:57:53 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x233.google.com (mail-lj1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::233]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D6C5C06174A for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 04:57:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-x233.google.com with SMTP id 3so9729119ljc.4 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 04:57:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LcJ2800EyCxJIF3shgr9AlAVM1fn74pr2tiYQzL8xJE=; b=AdzMGQXbTZlpspZO7ADNC55uLpmgq4SFNw62TTjvkMOFvTpF5oLdBcENliUb2whc4A oa+P9XpySwCa9R9nIrn7CrE1c3kJaWPX7tRGsEG4tT7HMLmZUqJz+aGRWeVvduOi6tIe pAsz+WmzBjN0VPeNDzoO9UgBz6CoTzCdoDEyGzbmQZK+lIObEGIy5O1WY+3fkdWtTu8X DV8xXTWPfvEwEArKe5EXjFihhmAEeX0WX64XQpXmLCClOU3Al+FzFMlWazzabwO0yHBf n6rtN+KcpwDHTpSVIkLa5jjvTH2HvKWep+nrFwMDiA73GT4YsLEpG8zaV5yudUs+zMId 1TqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LcJ2800EyCxJIF3shgr9AlAVM1fn74pr2tiYQzL8xJE=; b=YBrAGq1KQR+oKrYW1mhVOi4uoY6j9aEK+1Gbsk1eo8L+SsDDFf105KUKpn2Bj/Ahlv yawSWh2pMZb0onjTRlICe3ZdWzOHqm0MUwLuMmEyJWBxqLRGy74bwiRTBAX1FrvrTagx xK5GjQNiPPq04g3oAHOKt/ZiPC12S/djH5TaUAuY02ZL5MCFurLDovZe4QNPfH7/5RYO DtbYkiitQidXM3SXvb2hbd9OBtrWJCDru5TX/hEXLONS8e2z2HiFP9qayAE4SGsK9JlL 1HtW1J3lwHhNGAjSg++PX8//OwcqmKR0vgb3aTvgEz/E0Wg3JNAiCviYGo6yGkOgt9Uf wFaw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530roQlAc3xIL/08091IOwMzRbJ9P/FUVqw1z094T4/E445f1ZPi 9YTrlOQcVkI3nWb2yVV7BVf8Y8/lIt+3NhYzHdk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwH123Q4BN0574Acw1ps6kY41YZBSjGDhb6PU64cByS62TQwHTd6fOqnATLa5hyDJmzlEOTjkbSzLFIDHX/Rxs= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:6c0f:: with SMTP id h15mr826607ljc.305.1611406628839; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 04:57:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: "Patricia B. C." Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 09:56:57 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: RES: Can git change? To: Junio C Hamano , Martin von Zweigbergk Cc: Christian Couder , git Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hey, thanks for the replies, guys. Yes, as Junio said, my intention was to understand a bit about what you were doing, so thank you for the explanation! The idea isn't really to imitate what you are doing, but just to use it as a benchmark to show that changing the name of the branch might not seem like an important thing, but it is a global movement that is being adopted by many renowned developers. Quoting one of the comments on the discussion topic I raised: "It's only the default name for repositories created inside GitHub. Since our students only create their repositories locally on their computers with Git, I don't see how GitHub's decision will affect them. If Git decides to change over from master to main, and there is an industry-wide push to adopt this change (which doesn't seem very likely to me), then I might agree with you" So, I just wanted to show that guy that this is an industry-wide push :) Best regards, Patricia Camiansky. De: Junio C Hamano Enviado:sexta-feira, 22 de janeiro de 2021 23:27 Para: Martin von Zweigbergk Cc:Christian Couder; Patricia B. C.; git Assunto: Re: Can git change? Martin von Zweigbergk writes: > This is probably quite off topic for the thread, but I'm curious why > you think it was a bad idea to have octopus merges in git.git's > history (there seem to be 37 of them). Octoupi in our history, at least the older ones, solve no real life problem; it only gives us "now we have something cool-looking that other people's version control systems never had", which is of dubious value. And their presense makes bisection less efficient than it could be around them, which is a real downside.