git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bisect needing to be at repo top-level?
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 19:38:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJTo0LYp_FNfRYiLY3XivUxFN2JPCics=jbFsX+pVebEZ5XeSg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqbo3rz7ca.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

On 17 September 2013 18:27, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com> writes:
>
>> Why does git-bisect need to be ran from the top level of the working
>> tree?  It sources git-sh-setup.sh which sets GIT_DIR, which
>> git-bisect.sh then appears to consistently use.  Is there a reason for
>> needing to be at the top-level, or is this an old and redundant
>> message?
>
> A wild guess.
>
> Imagine if you start from a subdirectory foo/ but the directory did
> not exist in the older part of the history of the project.  When
> bisect needs to check out a revision that was older than the first
> revision that introduced that subdirectory, what should happen?
> Worse yet, if "foo" was a file in the older part of the history,
> what should happen?

"git checkout" doesn't mandate that you're at the top-level, so that's
not a very strong argument.

Ross

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-17 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-17 16:31 Bisect needing to be at repo top-level? Burton, Ross
2013-09-17 17:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-17 17:58   ` Lukas Fleischer
2013-09-17 19:20     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-19 13:15       ` Ben Aveling
2013-09-19 22:46         ` Ben Aveling
2013-09-19 23:04           ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-09 18:27       ` Stefan Beller
2013-10-09 18:55         ` Jeff King
2013-10-09 19:01           ` Stefan Beller
2013-09-17 18:38   ` Burton, Ross [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJTo0LYp_FNfRYiLY3XivUxFN2JPCics=jbFsX+pVebEZ5XeSg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ross.burton@intel.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).