From: Robert Dailey <rcdailey.lists@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Strange annotated tag issue
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 08:50:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHd499BTACjf91Ohi34ozFQE_NOn-LVf-35t7h4CTtDFoMCpWw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190321192928.GA19427@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 2:29 PM Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> Tags can point to any object, including another tag. It looks like
> somebody made an annotated tag of an annotated tag (probably by
> mistake, given that they have the same tag-name).
>
> Try this:
>
> git init
> git commit -m commit --allow-empty
> git tag -m inner mytag HEAD
> git tag -f -m outer mytag mytag
>
> git show mytag
>
> which produces similar output. You can walk the chain yourself with "git
> at-file tag 4.2.0.1900". That will have a "type" and "object" field
> which presumably point to the second commit.
>
> My guess is that somebody was trying to amend the tag commit message,
> but used the tag name to create the second one, rather than the original
> commit. I.e,. any of these would have worked for the second command to
> replace the old tag:
>
> git tag -f -m 'new message' mytag HEAD
>
> git tag -f -m 'new message' 2fcfd00ef84572fb88852be55315914f37e91e11
>
> git tag -f -m 'new message' mytag mytag^{commit}
>
> If the original tag isn't signed, you could rewrite it at this point
> using one of the above commands, coupled with GIT_COMMITTER_* to munge
> the author and date. But note that fetch doesn't update modified tags
> by default, so it may just cause confusion if you have a lot of people
> using the repository.
Thanks for explaining. This is very helpful. Am I naive to think that
this should be an error? I haven't seen a valid _pragmatic_ use for
tags pointing to tags. In 100% of cases (including this one), it is
done out of error. As per your example, users try to "correct" an
annotated tag pointing at a wrong tag or commit. What they expect is
the tag to point to the other tag's commit, but that's not what they
get.
From a high-level, pragmatic perspective, doesn't it make more sense
to change the git behavior so that annotated tags may only point to
commit objects? And in the `git tag -f -m outer mytag mytag` case in
your example, this would automatically perform `mytag^{}` to ensure
that the behavior the user expects is the behavior they get?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-25 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-21 16:59 Strange annotated tag issue Robert Dailey
2019-03-21 19:04 ` Bryan Turner
2019-03-21 19:39 ` Jeff King
2019-03-21 19:29 ` Jeff King
2019-03-25 13:50 ` Robert Dailey [this message]
2019-03-25 14:49 ` Jeff King
2019-03-25 15:31 ` Robert Dailey
2019-03-25 18:43 ` Bryan Turner
2019-03-25 23:36 ` Jeff King
2019-03-25 19:19 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-03-25 23:37 ` Jeff King
2019-03-26 7:53 ` [PATCH 0/3] tag: prevent recursive tags Denton Liu
2019-03-26 7:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Denton Liu
2019-03-26 8:51 ` Denton Liu
2019-03-26 10:10 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-03-27 4:57 ` Elijah Newren
2019-03-27 10:27 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-03-28 19:02 ` Robert Dailey
2019-03-26 7:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] t7004: ensure recursive tag behavior is working Denton Liu
2019-03-26 10:11 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-03-26 7:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] git-tag.txt: document --allow-recursive-tag option Denton Liu
2019-03-26 10:16 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-03-26 16:18 ` [PATCH 0/3] tag: prevent recursive tags Jeff King
2019-04-02 5:38 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] tag: prevent nested tags Denton Liu
2019-04-02 5:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] tag: fix formatting Denton Liu
2019-04-02 5:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] tag: prevent nested tags Denton Liu
2019-04-02 23:03 ` [PATCH v2.5 " Denton Liu
2019-04-03 7:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-03 8:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-03 18:26 ` Robert Dailey
2019-04-04 9:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-04 13:47 ` Robert Dailey
2019-04-04 21:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-05 2:51 ` Robert Dailey
2019-04-03 18:16 ` Johannes Sixt
2019-04-03 21:33 ` Denton Liu
2019-04-04 2:02 ` Jeff King
2019-04-04 9:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-04 12:27 ` Jeff King
2019-04-04 21:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-04 22:12 ` Jeff King
2019-04-11 18:40 ` Eckhard Maaß
2019-04-12 3:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-05 0:36 ` Elijah Newren
2019-04-05 5:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-04 18:25 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] tag: advise on recursive tagging Denton Liu
2019-04-04 18:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] tag: fix formatting Denton Liu
2019-04-04 18:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] tag: advise on nested tags Denton Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHd499BTACjf91Ohi34ozFQE_NOn-LVf-35t7h4CTtDFoMCpWw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rcdailey.lists@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).