From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthieu Brucher Subject: Re: git p4 clone not processing branches properly Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 19:11:55 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Vitor Antunes X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 05 20:12:01 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UvAUC-00031n-Iw for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 20:12:00 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757433Ab3GESL4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jul 2013 14:11:56 -0400 Received: from mail-oa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.219.51]:52159 "EHLO mail-oa0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752212Ab3GESL4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jul 2013 14:11:56 -0400 Received: by mail-oa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id i4so3750151oah.10 for ; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 11:11:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=KVTYsoccA/b23xG370+MyWJI+5Z+OFuTS2fofbm06Kw=; b=UtAoi1IBKV7Na8Co3XRnVr7JyKKxA1MOpu69b20aLdepn2votLuZrwHE/sfg75jTIU scEc6SLCx9ngGi9TKsbrkfBgHCT981nrqw1z6AetS3RcJsPdII83WW6KPvnkvlJs8kQF d4CHgvVjflg8gGxKJAqxxYXLrmpU1lx0fDvmh0onb3yH4vABA4NN5bX9ArNhSlGhYmHE DXoa7CeEbpmbMoNvuT+YiJNMqU7ul397rirTNqk02Dq6ry6uChjmCQoNHpf4KUt7byj3 TuFvrwQHImMdkDxhCW19S7NBQtsF2bUJpZ5tCkSlWPVm7flbLXaKXuzzJ5JfrUwvPrqT oFHQ== X-Received: by 10.60.133.14 with SMTP id oy14mr12276425oeb.84.1373047915521; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 11:11:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.153.5 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 11:11:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > Hi Matthieu, > > Could you please try using //Depot/Projectall instead of selecting a > specific revision? I can try. Indeed, at this revision, the two other branches do not yet exist. But @all will get everything? Last time, I only got head (IIRC). > Also, by using that command it means that the following depot paths must > exist: > //Depot/Project/Branch/Main > //Depot/Project/Releases/2013 > //Depot/Project/Branch/Feature1 Yes, they indeed do. > I've never used the --use-client-spec, so I'm not sure if that will not > break the branch detection code. I need to do that because if I don't, the depot is clobbed with binaries. Or perhaps if I put some .gitignore stuff, I might not do this? > Cheers, > Vitor Thanks for the tips, I will try tomorrow. Cheers, -- Information System Engineer, Ph.D. Blog: http://matt.eifelle.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher Music band: http://liliejay.com/