From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Ardill Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-related-0.1 Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:24:39 +1100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "git@vger.kernel.org" To: Felipe Contreras X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 11 00:25:28 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VUOfg-0006AI-Am for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:25:28 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756288Ab3JJWZV (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:25:21 -0400 Received: from mail-vc0-f176.google.com ([209.85.220.176]:38837 "EHLO mail-vc0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755772Ab3JJWZU (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:25:20 -0400 Received: by mail-vc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ik5so184601vcb.21 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 15:25:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=wj6TX1CwZr+YGmGdoC1WqC7UJhwlObLmRAKfJ+Z2r3k=; b=bbf7XHfwh5T05L7Hm6O2ZShnXTnP7PIXmeOoSNttMz8dtr1SJay/5Qgh61kGOo9MNG 9YqfPFAv7eGAHbtJTD41ULz5+e2vUlqxlorJUARl5bo9MY+cCFv+5rybB0sNBLGG4ASx dRQvXtjQI3Ow8T7e9xNXGB2F9jBiXkJhVP54xSRzi2XP0n5ojWZnX94+4v+9zkO26czz EIT7KMSqcM531Y7QqOGrRq+WjWZDwaqGUYt3SAhw+enNelpSBqwdfodJFwyKRZIJ/AbB bTASokPsloPn6ofeHjxSRB22+4ncGjCZmrTvQeUVBoeIb1wmRH47ZqJfnFGmoSiYW/iZ Rt1g== X-Received: by 10.52.35.20 with SMTP id d20mr12115120vdj.33.1381443919352; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 15:25:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.58.197 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 15:24:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 11 October 2013 08:43, Felipe Contreras wrote: > After gathering all the relevant > people, it groups them to show what exactly was their role when the > participated in the development of the relevant commit, and on how > many relevant commits they participated. It looks like you group by emails, any idea if anyone purposefully uses the same email but a different name? I don't know if the email is assumed to be the unique identifier, or if the name/email pair is, however I think the typical use case is definitely to group by email so it's a useful default behaviour. > They are only displayed if > they pass a minimum threshold of participation. Out of interest, how is the threshold determined and is it configurable? Regards, Andrew Ardill