From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sverre Rabbelier Subject: Re: Doesn't disambiguate between 'external command failed' and 'command not found' Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 13:24:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1309884564.18513.12.camel@umgah> <4E137701.1020007@elegosoft.com> <20110705231604.GC12085@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20110705232200.GD12085@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Michael Schubert , git@vger.kernel.org, Alex Vandiver To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jul 06 13:25:01 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QeQE0-00012I-OY for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 13:25:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752911Ab1GFLY4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2011 07:24:56 -0400 Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com ([74.125.83.174]:49370 "EHLO mail-pv0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752763Ab1GFLYz (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2011 07:24:55 -0400 Received: by pvg12 with SMTP id 12so5945044pvg.19 for ; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 04:24:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=8dXh5p4TAWotLvHlxyndpL7TAwrw1+FaexzvSPv9/FM=; b=XAcknKEOe3+AiUpPZI1gctwEZ2r3ms8gmLvh0oGEr8Jk7FBZGqK60OE5P/MUnQmHMW L+WhnoDUkO2Fa8WORaUw4h1N+dpF+6p3zvhINEVBNRAuBdgWFmqRbuw2ogsfJ0s+FFxp oM+83DoGQTBGpyTQYbzJf40z7xalj2PkOB3lw= Received: by 10.68.7.6 with SMTP id f6mr6486202pba.234.1309951495049; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 04:24:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.21.106 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 04:24:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110705232200.GD12085@sigill.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Heya, On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 01:22, Jeff King wrote: > So I think I prefer giving some more specific advice. Even if we don't > mention "#!" lines explicitly, saying "This exists, but exec didn't > work" is probably more helpful than pretending it's not there. It gives > clueful people an idea of where to start looking for the problem. Seconded. We should at least give the user enough information to figure out next steps. I like the advice from bad_interpreter_advice, although it might be phrased more as a suggestion "Try looking at ..."? -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier