From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
"git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Jan Palus <jan.palus@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t7406: correct test case for submodule-update initial population
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:07:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGZ79kbFjCQB_k8E1dMVop_EGF6TpnY04U1NV60VmSs1zHOnZw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170322215951.f4xbxehzvsd64c4y@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 02:49:48PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
>
>> * The syntax of the here-doc was wrong, such that the entire test was
>> sucked into the here-doc, which is why the test succeeded successfully.
>
> As opposed to succeeding unsuccessfully? :)
>
>> * The variable $submodulesha1 was not expanded as it was inside a single
>> quoted string. Use double quote to expand the variable.
>
> Hmm. Sort of. It was inside a non-interpolating here-doc inside a
> single-quoted string which was being eval'd. The second half is fine
> (the eval adds an extra layer of evaluation).
>
> Your fix:
>
>> + cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
>> + Execution of '\'"false $submodulesha1"\'' failed in submodule path '\''submodule'\''
>> + EOF
>
> _does_ work, but it does so because it's evaluating $submodulesha1 in
> the shell snippet and handing the result off to test_expect_success to
> eval. So it would have problems if:
>
> - that variable contained "\nEOF\n" itself ;)
>
> - the variable was modified inside the shell snippet.
>
> Neither of those is true, but I think:
>
> cat >expect <<-EOF &&
> Execution of '\''false $submodulesha1'\'' failed in ...
> EOF
>
> is safer and less surprising. The single-quote handling is unfortunate and
> ugly, but necessary to get them into the shell snippet in the first
> place. I notice the others tests in this script set up the expect file
> outside of a block. You could also do something like:
>
> sq=\'
> test_expect_success '...' '
> cat >expect <<-EOF
> Execution of ${sq}false $submodulesha1${sq} ...
> '
>
> but I'm not sure if that is any more readable.
>
If I recall correctly, I made a big fuss about single quotes used correctly when
writing that patch (which is why I may have lost track of the actual work there)
to be told the one and only blessed way to use single quotes in our test suite.
Your proposal to use ${sq} sounds good to me, though we did not
follow through with it for some other reason. I can reroll with that, though.
Thanks,
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-22 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-22 17:35 EOF test fixes (t5615/t7004) Jan Palus
2017-03-22 18:28 ` EOF test fixes (t7030/t7406) Jan Palus
2017-03-22 18:47 ` EOF test fixes (t5615/t7004) Stefan Beller
2017-03-22 19:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-22 20:08 ` [PATCH 0/3] fix "here-doc" syntax errors Junio C Hamano
2017-03-22 20:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] t5615: fix a here-doc syntax error Junio C Hamano
2017-03-22 21:02 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 20:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] t7406: fix here-doc syntax errors Junio C Hamano
2017-03-22 21:07 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 21:32 ` Stefan Beller
2017-03-22 21:39 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 21:49 ` [PATCH] t7406: correct test case for submodule-update initial population Stefan Beller
2017-03-22 21:59 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 22:07 ` Stefan Beller [this message]
2017-03-22 22:09 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 22:14 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-22 22:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-22 22:24 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 22:28 ` Stefan Beller
2017-03-22 21:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] t7406: fix here-doc syntax errors Junio C Hamano
2017-03-22 20:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] t7004, t7030: " Junio C Hamano
2017-03-22 21:10 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 21:43 ` Santiago Torres
2017-03-22 22:04 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 22:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-22 22:15 ` Santiago Torres
2017-03-22 22:22 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 22:34 ` Santiago Torres
2017-03-22 22:41 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 22:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-22 22:51 ` Santiago Torres
2017-03-23 22:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-23 22:28 ` Santiago Torres
2017-03-23 23:49 ` Jeff King
2017-03-24 16:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-24 16:49 ` Jeff King
2017-03-24 18:00 ` Jeff King
2017-03-24 18:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-24 18:16 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 22:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-22 22:40 ` [PATCH 0/3] fix "here-doc" " Jan Palus
2017-03-23 2:12 ` [PATCH] tests: lint for run-away here-doc Junio C Hamano
2017-03-23 5:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Junio C Hamano
2017-03-24 1:29 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-24 2:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-24 3:59 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGZ79kbFjCQB_k8E1dMVop_EGF6TpnY04U1NV60VmSs1zHOnZw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sbeller@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jan.palus@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).