From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIMWL_WL_MED,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907201F42D for ; Thu, 24 May 2018 19:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161173AbeEXTPK (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2018 15:15:10 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f178.google.com ([209.85.161.178]:40732 "EHLO mail-yw0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1034546AbeEXTPF (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2018 15:15:05 -0400 Received: by mail-yw0-f178.google.com with SMTP id p144-v6so929795ywg.7 for ; Thu, 24 May 2018 12:15:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6iMpxjuaGGEuY42AMf8DCkufbUTKjYhJ2yz5u9e5qn4=; b=CcWqk/32znU72WljqRS/QlQm7gFHwlrvvsnS/Noj+JQ42Hxhyl++BsbXQjNGdgUeLY /to7W05+at4s0Lb8SwZS3jd09qfCipvs7APVKj37IzGgOQWlbeDYy6F0qscbELcqApUb 3SeBG0/7RJDlpdnu0dPwrijYAEXTaSkCmWsWPK1qydDQCOYkYgrQ5CHfC7AVUkPf0C6M bjxL2g2+L+a4r/ctmqQEZvdi3Cj0dmK6dRTOrBXuu4uMnvSXF/EhOms6GkvFx6M59Ptg +HZwTlMYfmovgIdeaXJdlSyOekiBeMCjo06hnmFMzcPALc5OVxuIT8K8dH90L+JVYxFi DJHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6iMpxjuaGGEuY42AMf8DCkufbUTKjYhJ2yz5u9e5qn4=; b=XR4QgUHAAgLorl+HhTB7ukjHB6XSHI66O1B5KO/y6bl23Qfe4PdmjuIX3P14DmYfWz JvVMj9bFlCDARdW7AK/eQ2xEEZdp6sAnA2HCFTKd6vDYoYO7mfz+WXrWME1HWKYpMbDg GYjuU68+y6w7AjrEfGvV1exRGyx2NFY49DHY7jrAFE/sddFcSrZt1s93dl2GKzRLxi0P JbtNqTZOqfCcJPoD2/Cynq/G8JQa3bAY2H4VkAj8OsnM4T2CYhROTOSoulQ/Hh7gmwEz /FZUtkiXW0vy8qqxZQk6TJalCwSqDheSAQgaFraVZAJXWzDS8nvcY9H4ZKjXNsIwJN01 RO/A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwd4TOVadLRsl1JI0jcZFNwp49iTSymVYpg6xzfloBwxJAwtZ3ed xgYy2muM24IaSqPQELH6+98tMwmFGnnacBQviWr6He/W X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrumnxPCVG3WV3ZYw0WrC2nffwpgP74HKSNfoSoYpta6Q3T0fn8DAt2lXWrhXojDgquw4h+wetOviE6lwSL7oc= X-Received: by 2002:a81:508a:: with SMTP id e132-v6mr1969815ywb.421.1527189304076; Thu, 24 May 2018 12:15:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a25:e87:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2018 12:15:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Stefan Beller Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 12:15:03 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: is the standard "[]", and not "[options]" or other? To: "Robert P. J. Day" Cc: Git Mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:45 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > but should the man pages be updated similarly? i can whip up a patch > for that unless someone wants to comment on this further. Yes, please! I think [] are the best, as they are pedantically correct. [--options] is the worst, as there is not such thing as --options. Thanks, Stefan