git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / Atom feed
From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
To: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Cc: "git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/16] refs.c: use is_dir_sep() in resolve_gitlink_ref()
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:41:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGZ79kagZOmTDhsHr7-t42xoecW3rXUOU7Ss5B13Jyfk6PT24Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACsJy8A0x-PJsO+uhv8=mdfeKLEBPfT3sq3_Fi2_HffeexDeAw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The "submodule" argument in this function is a path, which can have
>>> either '/' or '\\' as a separator. Use is_dir_sep() to support both.
>>>
>>> Noticed-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
>>
>> Immediate questions that come to mind:
>> * Could this go in as an independent bug fix?
>
> It probably could. But it may depend on other submodule changes in this series.
>
>>   -> If so do we have any test that fails or stops failing on Windows?
>
> It was spotted during the review [1] so I guess no test fails on
> Windows (not that I would know because I can't run tests on Windows)
>
>>   -> If not, do we need one?
>
> Since I don't use Windows, I don't particularly care. And I can't add
> one anyway because I can't run it.
>
> [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/%3Ca74cf309-fb16-2f45-8189-d1d0c655dea4@kdbg.org%3E/

IIRC I asked these questions as I was genuinely confused,
I do not mind too much either.

>
>> * Assuming this is not an independent bug fix:
>>   Why do we need this patch in this series here?
>>   (I thought this is about worktrees, not submodules.
>>   So does this fix a potential bug that will be exposed
>>   later in this series, but was harmless up to now?)
>
> The series could probably be split in two. The first part is about
> using the new refs_* API in revision.c. This helps clean up refs API a
> bit, all *_submodule() functions will be one. Not strictly needed to
> be part of this, it's just a continuation of my previous series that
> introduces *_refs. Since submodule code is touched, this is found.
>
> The second part is actually fixing the prune bug.
>
> Should I split the series in two? I think I separated two parts in the
> past (maybe I misremember) at least in the description...

I had to reread the coverletter
https://public-inbox.org/git/20170823123704.16518-1-pclouds@gmail.com/
to get that part. I would not be opposed to splitting the series, but
I'll review an unsplit series as well.

Thanks,
Stefan

> --
> Duy

  reply index

Thread overview: 40+ messages in thread (expand / mbox.gz / Atom feed / [top])
2017-08-23 12:36 [PATCH v4 00/16] Fix git-gc losing objects in multi worktree Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-08-23 12:36 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] revision.h: new flag in struct rev_info wrt. worktree-related refs Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-08-23 12:36 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] refs.c: use is_dir_sep() in resolve_gitlink_ref() Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-08-23 19:14   ` Stefan Beller
2017-09-06 11:08     ` Duy Nguyen
2017-09-06 17:41       ` Stefan Beller [this message]
2017-08-23 12:36 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] revision.c: refactor add_index_objects_to_pending() Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-08-23 12:36 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] revision.c: --indexed-objects add objects from all worktrees Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-08-23 19:25   ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-23 12:36 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] refs.c: refactor get_submodule_ref_store(), share common free block Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-08-23 19:34   ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-23 12:36 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] refs: move submodule slash stripping code to get_submodule_ref_store Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-09-09  5:45   ` Michael Haggerty
2017-08-23 12:36 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] refs: add refs_head_ref() Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-08-24 21:52   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-09-06 11:23     ` Duy Nguyen
2017-08-23 12:36 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] revision.c: use refs_for_each*() instead of for_each_*_submodule() Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-08-24 21:56   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-08-23 12:36 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] refs.c: move for_each_remote_ref_submodule() to submodule.c Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-08-23 12:36 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] refs: remove dead for_each_*_submodule() Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-08-23 19:45   ` Stefan Beller
2017-09-09  5:59   ` Michael Haggerty
2017-08-23 12:36 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] revision.c: --all adds HEAD from all worktrees Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-08-23 19:54   ` Stefan Beller
2017-09-06 11:19     ` Duy Nguyen
2017-09-06 17:43       ` Stefan Beller
2017-09-09  6:04   ` Michael Haggerty
2017-08-23 12:37 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] files-backend: make reflog iterator go through per-worktree reflog Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-08-24 14:13   ` Richard Maw
2017-09-09  6:30   ` Michael Haggerty
2017-08-23 12:37 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] revision.c: --reflog add HEAD reflog from all worktrees Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-08-23 12:37 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] rev-list: expose and document --single-worktree Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-08-23 20:45   ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-23 12:37 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] refs.c: remove fallback-to-main-store code get_submodule_ref_store() Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-09-09  6:36   ` Michael Haggerty
2017-08-23 12:37 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] refs.c: reindent " Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-09-09  6:41   ` Michael Haggerty
2017-08-25 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 00/16] Fix git-gc losing objects in multi worktree Michael J Gruber
2017-09-06 10:53   ` Duy Nguyen
2017-09-09  6:45 ` Michael Haggerty

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to, --cc,
  and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGZ79kagZOmTDhsHr7-t42xoecW3rXUOU7Ss5B13Jyfk6PT24Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sbeller@google.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://public-inbox.org/git
	git clone --mirror http://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/git

Newsgroups are available over NNTP:
	nntp://news.public-inbox.org/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git

 note: .onion URLs require Tor: https://www.torproject.org/
       or Tor2web: https://www.tor2web.org/

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox