From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703111F667 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:53:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752120AbdHPSxz (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:53:55 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.161.172]:34272 "EHLO mail-yw0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751765AbdHPSxy (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:53:54 -0400 Received: by mail-yw0-f172.google.com with SMTP id s143so28203595ywg.1 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:53:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=d8+WZ5LHR3QeYuIumYVi+2nP3++mizmE2TN0Zn7o1mA=; b=YbaXXYfv4JCgcs702izST+cc4zR1fZGfJg/CsHIevXutY1wjJOZoJ0xeFhKPefscR9 DQI+VYiddPwYv9bc/w7XcZzY4SpDOAdTqAJhJ8mxjYRL+6Fn8gbqCb4VJD9SYs3fFrJo WJJ3GfZiclL4JhMzSh96LuwkPfI5O1Q2psLHxIcp92CLJBQoDRj/RA/8NecMHYrhD+EE 8p8aHtHMci3TW1hmlUPmP+G9tj4zzBWrzIZ8TDgTtAcQy8r/zX5djwsVDpD4jIIGOESv w7xFEtRDtr2vIIL8a9QHL/aUW5jYTqSU0vg5zETC7vOjASTVcCHhNNMZTxYPIP8liBJi RXHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=d8+WZ5LHR3QeYuIumYVi+2nP3++mizmE2TN0Zn7o1mA=; b=Kx0GyZNciurxG0oCp4mBjM4tFrARyrPDUqrUW+4GYrLjqFrW0LYi93S13YaVUW5WOl ggBS06aINf5ajcz5RuMqw25hj9vtcgB97wSC+hBS5ntt9KEfc/mh7Dw35zKBEBtps0+G Vns9DRwsKe7Or2zRLkUrF7zYQWVfe4D+a7uL8mRRCK9umjO3Zz1eqwrEv2RLtvKQqaHm Dxvli3cm5Hyw8YCKBgA5YoWUI9CIkdWin7B4dYHNZUmTCPl84i4xS7zhDEW7ZsBm4I1M wJtLw6l0eOsM98TJIrp6HBKDSZHLhv3rdTLVJheQh234QA2De5qr/cunu/3WWCCwuLou 41kA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5j+po/sKbQXqoCn0yLK6GM8R3zvAaymZfBmWeFRDXdZHhKiv90k bM+5Jfp1cJ9RttVTygkM9KwEgV54i/n6 X-Received: by 10.37.55.79 with SMTP id e76mr2224621yba.215.1502909631553; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:53:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.56.142 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:53:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4283F0B0-BC1C-4ED1-8126-7E512D84484B@gmail.com> From: Stefan Beller Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:53:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Submodule regression in 2.14? To: Lars Schneider Cc: "git@vger.kernel.org" , Junio C Hamano Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Stefan Beller wrote: > Any chance the "did not happen with 2.13" was not > freshly cloned but tested on an existing repo? If so a hot > candidate for suspicion is a93dcb0a56 (Merge branch > 'bw/submodule-is-active', 2017-03-30), IMHO, just > gut feeling, though. which makes it a feature, I should add.